Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-84830-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11262 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 19:40:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 19:40:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 59489 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 19:40:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59389 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 19:40:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59382 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 19:40:39 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:39 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [76.13.13.42] (HELO smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com)
 (76.13.13.42)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 37340 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 19:40:09 -0000
Received: from drwoods.local (dwoods@174.99.58.61 with plain)
        by smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP;
 11 Aug 2010 12:40:09 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: sCI.ryiswBB7FW.DxjU523c87MI-
X-YMail-OSG: 2fcmmEcVM1lvEE0yhbspAVytN85yFVYMBqYV__tvu.3bvuT
 F47M3sCz3bPosEMtWs6JeAGqWmtqYYwmrwo_L4tD9upKbHJgRqdUe2T5i1uU
 nUwOkqke3GEqgYX1iA5.pa8GGAbisZMouBYUdRL3NpMwDhrJPKKQoewp9gVL
 DypiBxXjJWLeKK13cpTMKPvj4wOaI9bbTsdVSh0p_rIq5Sdn6CEUa0Mimcky
 S86S2IKfEAC5n3JrmZvjMQ70v4lfjsR893s55BETbOWqlpqFWLGoQmlwZCZA
 _bK9Zy_sUToQVf5IhZgTDXp3SfBm565MCuhJEFFRiKiMuNKCKobuL5laY
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4C62FC97.7010004@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:40:07 -0400
From: Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss]atinject tck
References: <AANLkTinXbfJo_sUO+YybG+wA3jat6a3VbeZHoPn3NvOb@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C62CA87.30005@apache.org>
 <AANLkTi=W1wK_jtqiXJ=QWAd41J2UsbTcLf3193UHQ4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=W1wK_jtqiXJ=QWAd41J2UsbTcLf3193UHQ4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org



On 8/11/10 12:58 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Donald
> 
> Thanks for the reply.  I am not familar with BVAL tck.  Can you point
> me the suiteXmlFiles?   

After running the validator-tck-runner, take a look at -
	target/dependency/jsr303-tck-suite.xml

Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid
> archive to be deployed to a App server?

Yes, it deploys WARs to the server, but the JBoss testharness creates
them based on the following setting -
    <name>org.jboss.testharness.standalone</name>
        <value>false</value>
    </property>

If you turn on the "write-artifacts-to-disk" profile, then all of the
WARs that are used are created under target/jsr303-artifacts.


-Donald


> 
> Please see more comments in line.
> 
> Lin
> 
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
>> It looks like the same general setup as the BVAL tck, in that it uses
>> the surefire plugin and a suiteXmlFiles which is either provided in the
>> downloaded TCK files or provided locally (which I don't think we can use
>> the open web beans overrides unless we have TCK challenges approved by
>> Oracle.)
> 
> Could you please explain why we could not use the tck runner from open
> web beans?   If we want to run the tests ourselves, we could copy some
> files to make it happen.  They are all under ASL v2.0.
> 
> atinject tck itself didn't provide any instruction on how to run them,
> other than the java doc.  In the javadoc, it indicates the test needs
> to be configured with your injector.  There is no mentioning of
> running this against a real App Server.  The fact that they didn't
> provide a java ee archive and only provided .class files made me
> believe deploy/configure the class files onto the injector is
> sufficient.
>