geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [discuss]Web profile assemblies
Date Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:43:27 GMT
Sounds good to me.

Jarek

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, thanks, I'll take your recommendation and keep both. :)
>
> I just removed the webservices-common and webservices-builder.
>
> We still need geronimo-webservices module since it is used by
> geronimo-tomcat whenever user requests to retrieve to see the wsdl via
> http and the work is delegated to the geronimo-webservices.
>
> So in additional to the base web profile, I think we added the
> following support:
>
> javamail
> connector
> javaee management/deployment
> jaspic (currently in)
> jacc
>
> Did the above sound right to people?
>
> Lin
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  On 8/20/2010 4:36 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>>
>>> It seems hard to remove javamail given openejb depends on it.   At
>>> least for the javamail schema for JNDI, which is used by the
>>> openejb-client.
>>>
>>> Also, I don't quite understand this comment in G roomt pom.xml -
>>>
>>>            <!-- Use
>>> org.apache.geronimo.javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail
>>>               uber jar containing both the spec and the providers in order
>>> that
>>>               users can actually use mail without advanced degrees in
>>> geronimo
>>>               classloading.  DO NOT add or replace this with
>>>               org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec -->
>>>             <dependency>
>>>                 <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.javamail</groupId>
>>>                 <artifactId>geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail</artifactId>
>>>                 <version>1.8.1</version>
>>>             </dependency>
>>>
>>> This seems to indicate that it is recommended to have java mail spec
>>> and impl together as dependency, instead of just using the spec jar.
>>
>> The uber jar is required in order for the Geronimo mail component to work
>> correctly, since it configures the various transport implementations.  If
>> that is removed, it might be possible to revert to just the spec jar, but I
>> think I'd recommend against it because it makes it more difficult to
>> incrementally add the full javamail support back in.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>> Lin
>>>
>>>> 1. whether we keep jaspi and javamail in web profile assembly?  I
>>>> personally would say no, but open to opinions.
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message