geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lin Sun <linsun....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [discuss]atinject tck
Date Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:53:34 GMT
Thanks for the link - that is rather detailed and matches what I
discovered so far.

I have no prob in having their tck runner in our tck dir.  I'll work on that.

Lin

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
> Yep, finally found the OWB email talking about the TCKs (see Q/A #3) -
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openwebbeans-dev/201001.mbox/%3C683599.32550.qm@web38207.mail.mud.yahoo.com%3E
>
> For build automation, I'd prefer we have copies of these OWB TCK
> projects in our own svn in the geronimo/tck area.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
>
> On 8/11/10 12:56 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> Donald,
>>
>> As Lin pointed out the atinject is a bit different. Both JCDI and Bean
>> Validation TCKs can be run in standalone and in-container mode. For
>> Geronimo we run them in in-container mode. However, the atinject TCK
>> seems to only support the standalone mode. So the question is, is it
>> enough to just run the atinject TCK in standalone mode or do we have
>> to write some extra code to ensure it runs in in-container mode with
>> Geronimo?
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
>>> It looks like the same general setup as the BVAL tck, in that it uses
>>> the surefire plugin and a suiteXmlFiles which is either provided in the
>>> downloaded TCK files or provided locally (which I don't think we can use
>>> the open web beans overrides unless we have TCK challenges approved by
>>> Oracle.)
>>>
>>> You should be able to copy the content from
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-tck/
>>> over into our geronimo/tck/branches/3.0/ area and make a
>>> atinject-tck-runner project similar to the validator-tck-runner.  Jarek
>>> already created the required jboss-test-harness-geronimo module to allow
>>> the JBoss TCK testharness to start/stop a Geronimo server, so the
>>> biggest part of the effort would be mapping the openwebbeans profile
>>> from Tomcat over to using Geronimo....
>>>
>>> Since the JBoss provided TCKs use ASL 2.0, take a look at their website,
>>> which usually describes in pretty good detail how to run the TCKs in
>>> other app servers.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/11/10 9:30 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have been investigating how to run the JSR 330 tck (also called the
>>>> atinject tck), as this is a requirement for Java EE 6 compliance.
>>>>
>>>> I am able to check out the open web bean project and run its atinject
>>>> tck from the open web bean project checkout dir, using the atinject
>>>> tck runner provided by open web bean   Basically the atinject tck
>>>> runner deploys the tck test classes (note it is not an archive) to a
>>>> stand-alone test container and the atinect tck tests verifies various
>>>> fields/constructors/methods are injected correctly.   The special part
>>>> of the atinject tck is that there is no Java EE archive and all tests
>>>> are written as junit tests.
>>>>
>>>> My first thought is we could reuse the atinject tck runner from open
>>>> web bean project to run the tck, but the concern is that the tests are
>>>> only deployed to a stand-alone test container instead of the Geronimo
>>>> server.  So I am not sure if that is valid.
>>>>
>>>> My current thoughts are that atinject tck is relatively small and are
>>>> junit tests thus it is reasonable to run in a stand-alone test
>>>> container.  The JCDI(JSR 299) tck overlaps some of the atinject tck
>>>> and should run with the real Application Server like Geronimo.
>>>>
>>>> If we also agree with this approach, I think we can just reuse the
>>>> atinject tck runner in open web bean.   WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Lin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:43 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs
>>>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public
>>>>> svn location.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I guess we should create a
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks
>>>>> over. There should be no problem with moving the following modules
>>>>> (since it's all Apache licensed stuff):
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) jboss-test-harness-geronimo - integration code between jboss test
>>>>> harness & geronimo which is used by #2 and #3
>>>>> 2) jcdi-testsuite - jcdi tck runner
>>>>> 3) validator-testsuite - bean validation tck runner
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>> Please note that the above TCK tests are in our public SVN. Unlike the
>>>> mainstream Java EE TCK tests, which we are required to keep private,
>>>> these tests are Apache licensed. We can discuss them openly. This
>>>> means we have TCK materials in two places (public svn and private
>>>> svn). I *much* prefer to have our TCK materials in public svn. So,
>>>> although it complicates some things, IMO, we should err on the side of
>>>> openness, rather than simplicity...
>>>>
>>>> --kevan
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message