geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Delos <dait...@gmail.com>
Subject Cancel - Re: [VOTE] maven-plugins 1.1 for Geronimo Eclipse Plugins
Date Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:42:31 GMT
Cancel this voting.

As Kevan mentioned, we have no source-release file generated. So I have to
regenerate the staging repository. I will re-launch the voting once a new
staging repository is set up.

2010/8/10 Delos <daition@gmail.com>

> OK, I got your meaning. I was confused by source jar and source-release
> zip. It's the first time maven-plugin is released with release plugin, the
> source-release zip file is missing. There must be some mis-configure in its
> pom. I will investigate it.
>
> 2010/8/10 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>
>
>> On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:26 PM, Delos wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Kevan,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your reply!
>> >
>> > maven-plugin 1.1 is parent of maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.1. We only have
>> source code for maven-eclipsepde-plugin. You may find it under
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/org/apache/geronimo/devtools/maven-eclipsepde-plugin/1.1/
>>
>> Right. That's the sources jar file, I mentioned. The jar file is not a
>> replacement for a source distribution file. As you note, it does not contain
>> the necessary files (to build).
>>
>> >
>> > Do you mean maven-eclipsepde-plugin-1.1-sources.jar is not buildable?
>>  It's generated by release plugin. All the source jar generated by the
>> plugin doesn't contain a pom, so we can't build it. Is there anything wrong
>> in my understanding?
>>
>> See
>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/components/geronimo-txmanager-parent/3.0/for
examples of source "distributions", n
>>
>> >
>> > If you hope to build the source, I'm afraid you need to check out the
>> tag first.
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/tags/1.1/
>>
>> No. As a release manager, you are preparing a source distribution file.
>> That is the artifact(s) that the community is "releasing". Our community
>> expects that the contents of this source distribution will match the
>> contents of the svn tag. However, the vote should be performed on the source
>> distribution file (not svn).
>>
>> In case there's any question, I'm -1 until this issue is resolved.
>>
>> --kevan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Delos

Mime
View raw message