My +1.

--Ashish

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com> wrote:
+1


On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.

The tag has been created here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6/ <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.5/>

The staging repo is here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/>

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.5/geronimo-2.1.5-source-release.tar.gz>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.5/geronimo-2.1.5-source-release.zip>

The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository for your convenience:

http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/

We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for longer than the 72-hour minimum.

[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Rick



--
Vamsi