geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.1
Date Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:17:36 GMT
OK, thanks for clarifying it, Kevan
I will wait to tomorrow, if no objection, I hope to pass this long time
vote.

2010/6/2 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>

>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> I checked the Tomcat's own NOTICE files, we do not distribute those
> components in the customized Tomcat release.
>
> Quoted from NOTICE file :
>
> The Windows Installer is built with the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System
> (NSIS), which is open source software. The original software and related
> information is available at http://nsis.sourceforge.net.
> Java compilation software for JSP pages is provided by Eclipse, which is
> open source software. The original software and related information is
> available at http://www.eclipse.org. For the bayeux implementation
> The org.apache.cometd.bayeux API is derivative work originating at the Dojo
> Foundation * Copyright 2007-2008 Guy Molinari * Copyright 2007-2008 Filip
> Hanik * Copyright 2007 Dojo Foundation * Copyright 2007 Mort Bay Consulting
> Pty. Ltd.
> The original XML Schemas for Java EE Deployment Descriptors: - javaee_5.xsd
> - javaee_web_services_1_2.xsd - javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd -
> javaee_6.xsd - javaee_web_services_1_3.xsd -
> javaee_web_services_client_1_3.xsd - web-app_3_0.xsd - web-common_3_0.xsd -
> web-fragment_3_0.xsd - jsp_2_2.xsd may be obtained from
> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/
>
> In the LICENSE file, I found other licenses except for ASL in the following
> :
> 1.  Eclipse Public License - v 1.0
> 2. zlib/libpng license.
> 3. bzip2 license.
> 4. Common Public License version 1.0.
> 5. COMMON DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION LICENSE (CDDL) Version 1.0
>
> All those licenses are for Tomcat sub components.
>
> I am not quite familiar those license issues, but since we do not
> distribute those components, we should not require to add them.
> Comments ?
>
>
> As long as the LICENSE/NOTICE information do not cover any of the
> source/binaries that we are releasing, then that sounds correct.
>
> --kevan
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Mime
View raw message