geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Stoddard <wgstodd...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Date Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:28:36 GMT
On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for 
> the release were
>
> Rick McGuire
> Jarek Gawor
> Kevan Woods
> Donald Wood
> Joe Bohn
>
> Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts 
> will be promoted and made available for download ASAP.
>
> Rick

Hi, Rick.
Couple of comments...

There's a problem with the names of the install packages.   Check out 
the link to the tomcat7 image on this page:
http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html

That link tries to download this file:
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz

Actual name is:
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz

Maybe a good idea to work up an announcement letter when GEP and sample 
apps are ready.

Bill
>
> On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE 
>> problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that 
>> Jarek noticed have been included.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220

>>
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ 
>>
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip

>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz

>>
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>
>


Mime
View raw message