geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Date Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:29:19 GMT
On 6/18/2010 8:24 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-)
>    
Yeah...it's been a rough morning!

Rick

>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>    
>> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the
>> release were
>>
>> Rick McGuire
>> Jarek Gawor
>> Kevan Woods
>> Donald Wood
>> Joe Bohn
>>
>> Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will
>> be promoted and made available for download ASAP.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>      
>>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
>>> problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
>>> noticed have been included.
>>>
>>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>>
>>>
>>> Staged to
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>>
>>>
>>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>>> plausible builds from them.
>>>
>>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>        
>>
>>      
>    


Mime
View raw message