geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Date Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:11:34 GMT


On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I
> don't think have been pointed out yet:
> 
> Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql
> connector rars in server images as with previous releases.  I guess this
> isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means -
> just a bit annoying.

Yep, I fixed that in trunk.

> 
> I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a
> geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version).  This doesn't actually
> exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either.
> 
> I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat
> assembly.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem
>> has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed
>> have been included.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>
>>
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>>
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message