geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Date Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:17:11 GMT
Those versions on Mac....

What problem did you encounter?  Did you run the bootstrap build first?
mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
mvn install


-Donald


On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Donald,
> 
> I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
> with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
> 1.6.0_20.  Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
> tag?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org
> <mailto:dwoods@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
>     +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
> 
>     Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
> 
> 
>     -Donald
> 
> 
>     On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>     > +0.5
>     >
>     > M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
>     > the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
>     > be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
>     > setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
>     > var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
>     > following in var/config/config.xml:
>     >
>     > <attribute name="ServerUrl">tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
>     > PortOffset}</attribute>
>     >
>     > to
>     >
>     > <attribute name="ServerUrl">tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
>     > PortOffset}</attribute>
>     >
>     > Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
>     > server startup by the activemq plugin.
>     >
>     > M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
>     > error from time to time.
>     >
>     > Jarek
>     >
>     > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com
>     <mailto:rickmcg@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
>     problem has
>     >> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
>     noticed have been
>     >> included.
>     >>
>     >> See the JIRA issues here:
>     >>
>     >>
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220>
>     >>
>     >> Staged to
>     >>
>     >>
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>     >>
>     >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>     >>
>     >>
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>     >>
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>     >>
>     >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>     >> plausible builds from them.
>     >>
>     >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>     >>
>     >> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>     >> [  ]  0 no opinion
>     >> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>     >>
>     >> Rick
>     >>
>     >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vamsi

Mime
View raw message