Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer;
  b=E7vWjFCzGAw616ebGA4QtplgEnnOanFQvwKBcQVuGRkcChWRNgBVE7Rn8SZcxYS8QgOBC2TeI7iaCPC/CoQ4W461OKW/de7BY/sbFvn/5qDtESYLC14nNte9e5hjFrbRSVDkHOA14M07vY0nXbn1WUWMcH20oxP28Wf4+Oh0r3g=
  ;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Subject: Re: What should be the openejb release number used for Geronimo.
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BEC2EED.1090802@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:11:46 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E53479EE-184B-4FF7-B316-729B4776D130@yahoo.com>
References: <4BEC2EED.1090802@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On May 13, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> I'm getting the openejb snapshot that David Blevins created for the M1 =
release ready for a release vote, and I was wondering what version =
number should be used for these jars.  These will be released under the =
org.apache.geronimo.openejb groupid and currently is building with a =
version number of 3.1.3-r942249.  I'm wondering if this should be the =
org.apache.geronimo.ext.openejb groupid to be consistent with how we're =
handling the tomcat external release.  The Tomcat external release used =
a version number of 7.0.0.0, with the last digit reflecting the Geronimo =
version number.  Should we follow this convention for the openejb =
release, or stick with the release number than includes the origin =
revision number?

I think the groupId should follow what we did for tomcat.

I think that since this is not a release of a particular openejb svn =
revision (e.g. we changed the groupId), we should not include an openejb =
svn revision number in the version, i.e. we should use something like =
3.1.3.0

I can be talked out of either of these opinions :-)

thanks
david jencks

>=20
> Rick