Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59150 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 09:06:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 09:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 87113 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 09:06:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87081 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 09:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87073 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 09:06:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 09:06:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ashjain2@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.54] (HELO mail-gw0-f54.google.com) (74.125.83.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 09:05:55 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so1252116gwj.13 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 02:05:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=okP+VF4jPYu/aBqcaOGD1MUgBmvZQyU+opyimsEXZoo=; b=xE2OafY+ndF7iGwV3IIb47xuPYYIkATFZLaiLrIXUwPZy+K1tQZWgVjSLKQqfB8si5 aT8RjZeu9IEQxjeErW2FIiSwOye0TI2s96W/DIRWXeJ71iV+VKNLHg3FLXS1KLYBvrr3 JHJQpnPzJvGfhzuHQFiR6S9HWTAb+VDub9tGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=geb5z2959/e4VPJou2QWq86HK/AAhEO65QcsBgj+Zso7Z4r0TKMAv5ulhmUG+nSJwP uuT4rLUSPwlcIgUPsgcVIlmLSuI/0Kf3pXKftrepa5mvhYyjXuxFAC8+KQBBphCuc7Ve 5SUqTcbFBxU3PbcInciqR+ryoYYfGZgrp1Jr8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.172.5 with SMTP id z5mr2535501ago.25.1273568733990; Tue, 11 May 2010 02:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.51.10 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 02:05:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:35:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1 From: Ashish Jain To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6470d9afc90e404864dd390 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6470d9afc90e404864dd390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Build looks fine my +1 On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:01 AM, David Jencks wrote: > >> Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. >> >> The major changes to this release are: >> - packaged as an osgi bundle >> - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's >> ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. >> - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. >> >> I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to >> me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. >> The import version ranges are >> <_versionpolicy>[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@))) >> for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). >> >> I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the >> jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next >> time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. >> >> Staging repo is here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ >> >> tag is here: >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ >> >> Vote open 72 hours >> >> [ ] +1 release this >> [ ] 0 don't care >> [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> > > > > -- > Vamsi > --0016e6470d9afc90e404864dd390 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Build looks fine my +1

On Tue, May 11, 20= 10 at 12:25 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com> wrote:
+1


On T= hu, May 6, 2010 at 5:01 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com&= gt; wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component.

The major changes to this release are:
- packaged as an osgi bundle
- fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's Provider= Locator that actually works in osgi.
- dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies.

I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to = me. =A0Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.= 0. =A0The import version ranges are
<_versionpolicy>[$(version;=3D=3D;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))</_versi= onpolicy>
for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1).

I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspi= c spec as well, but I didn't. =A0There's always something. =A0Maybe= next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us.

Staging repo is here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito= ries/orgapachegeronimo-012/

tag is here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ger= onimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/

Vote open 72 hours

[ ] +1 release this
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

thanks
david jencks



--
Vamsi

--0016e6470d9afc90e404864dd390--