geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OSGi version for Geronimo packages
Date Thu, 06 May 2010 13:42:44 GMT
Keep in mind that in osgi, 3.0.0.m1 > 3.0.0 !!!

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 15:24, Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I think no. 3 is cool.   some other qualifiers that I can think of are
>
> 3.0.0.m1, 3.0.0.m2, 3.0.0.release
>
>
> Lin
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Before the milestone release we might have to figure out what osgi
> > version (if any) the Geronimo packages should be exported at. I can
> > think of a few possibilities:
> >
> > 1) No version exported for milestone releases. In the final release
> > everything would be exported with "3.0.0" version.
> >
> > 2) Use version "3.0.0" for milestones and final release. Milestones
> > are milestones and should not be used once the final is out.
> >
> > 3) Add some qualifier to the osgi version for milestone and final
> > releases. We just need to be careful to pick the right qualifiers so
> > that osgi resolves to the latest version. For example for milestones
> > we could assign "3.0.0.M1" or "3.0.0.M2" but for the final we would
> > have to assign "3.0.0.final" or some other qualifier that is greater
> > then 'Mx' using String.compareTo() rules.
> >
> > Thoughts or any other possibilities? I like #3 (or some version of it)
> > but I'm also ok with #2.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message