Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhhsld@gmail.com designates
 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=vp4cuT9D2RYrUisZt1eCOmm8lfjdtAp57C9mLm8hS5huz9Sl6rgSS5dO+3rkC7Ljt+
         WPKKVNwWZDSDlEo41G4GTl/eF0dy/zH4sjm2lOCc3qTVmIAoZyYZM6b796PI3N+n1RMZ
         dKyK5kIJ/3L2UJ5rwi22YdX1doH9t70z0svKI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F2322B1E-4C02-4020-9B1F-C0355359FDFE@gmail.com>
References: <4BB9E05B.9040403@gmail.com>
	 <z2v45f744e41004050623o9e91c67cobf4c6fab230505d8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <F2322B1E-4C02-4020-9B1F-C0355359FDFE@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:10:38 +0800
Message-ID: <u2q45f744e41004050710s3ca826acib7cd28d52be32d86@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: components dependencies
From: Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e7efeb684c504837de499

--0016361e7efeb684c504837de499
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks, Kevan. I am afraid that we may still need to release an OSGI style
1.4 and 1.5 for Geronimo 3.0.

2010/4/5 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>

>
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote:
>
> > For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could
> double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the
> geronimo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned it in the
> past, and Donald gave me some suggestions to refer to the OpenJPA project.
>  I do update them from my understanding. But ... Anyway, if we are OK with
> the current descriptions, I would move 1.4 and 1.5 out as soon as possible.
>
> IIRC, I took a quick look at the ee6 schema license/notice files and they
> looked good. Would definitely re-review prior to release.
>
> Are we going to/do we need to release 1.4 and 1.5 schema's? Originally the
> 1.4 and 1.5 schemas had license restrictions which prohibited us including
> in our svn. If all xsd's have been fixed, then we can move them out. It
> would be good to do this, but if we don't need to re-release them, it's not
> absolutely imperative, IMO.
>
> --kevan


-- 
Ivan

--0016361e7efeb684c504837de499
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks, Kevan. I am afraid that we may still need to release an OSGI style =
1.4 and 1.5 for Geronimo 3.0.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2010/4/5 Ke=
van Miller <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kevan.miller@gmail.com">=
kevan.miller@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"im"=
><br>
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could =
double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the geroni=
mo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned it in the past,=
 and Donald gave me some suggestions to refer to the OpenJPA project. =A0I =
do update them from my understanding. But ... Anyway, if we are OK with the=
 current descriptions, I would move 1.4 and 1.5 out as soon as possible.<br=
>

<br>
</div>IIRC, I took a quick look at the ee6 schema license/notice files and =
they looked good. Would definitely re-review prior to release.<br>
<br>
Are we going to/do we need to release 1.4 and 1.5 schema&#39;s? Originally =
the 1.4 and 1.5 schemas had license restrictions which prohibited us includ=
ing in our svn. If all xsd&#39;s have been fixed, then we can move them out=
. It would be good to do this, but if we don&#39;t need to re-release them,=
 it&#39;s not absolutely imperative, IMO.<br>

<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--kevan</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Ivan<br>

--0016361e7efeb684c504837de499--