Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67301 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 00:40:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 00:40:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 27477 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 00:40:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27289 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 00:40:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27278 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 00:40:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:40:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhhsld@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.181] (HELO mail-qy0-f181.google.com) (209.85.221.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:40:51 +0000 Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so6646977qyk.13 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:40:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i9jt0k4V7Rs/YZPUv7NO3P4o1/lFlS/auKhA8rRVPWs=; b=A0qH9cW8XYVU+koA41doAv4ITSoIH4UiZMGelEkDIvBvn2d3uiFQdjH1LuRIOu4l6v Y4kpyUywgA9Zc3WCxB28BdUI59S+aiXrOouysdu5M1Y8O2gFYinHFnSsCKUshIV7hYDW FQzG3XaERdBJm68NhJa/bJSOCFemTtP/IW/1Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ksBqzEnl2+fJhZCom5XT2oKXssBqov8K+sFhKmDj4zKrWaghwmRr7DLRcqh0puimk/ W7KSfMoVzOGTU8/Lu7i4+hIUNqeBxjaAqotrzJ8VdQSu57SfKI0HIr9NMYGp7qlSDUtP 6fLs1MCjy2B2tq7yicKlKQVM2Ia5D3/ioxc64= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.1.231 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BC48684.5020600@gmail.com> References: <4BC48684.5020600@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:40:30 +0800 Received: by 10.229.98.129 with SMTP id q1mr2947170qcn.100.1271205630702; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: ActiveMQ version for the M1 release. From: Ivan To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, rickmcg@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364274e70df560048427a0fa --0016364274e70df560048427a0fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I like the repackage way :-) 2010/4/13 Rick McGuire > I just did an experiment to see if the ActiveMQ 5.3.1 release could be used > for the 3.0 M1 release. The results were not good. The build failed fairly > quickly because the 5.3.1 bundles are importing the annotation packages > using [1.0,1.1), which makes them incompatible with the 1.1 version of the > annotation classes required for java ee 6. So, it appears we need to either > repackage the 5.3.1 bundles to change the imports or create a special > snapshot version of activemq for the M1. Any opinions on which way we > should be going with this? > > Rick > -- Ivan --0016364274e70df560048427a0fa Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like the repackage way :-)

2010/4/13 Ri= ck McGuire <rickm= cg@gmail.com>
I just did an experiment to see if the ActiveMQ 5.3.1 release could be used= for the 3.0 M1 release. =A0The results were not good. =A0The build failed = fairly quickly because the 5.3.1 bundles are importing the annotation packa= ges using [1.0,1.1), which makes them incompatible with the 1.1 version of = the annotation classes required for java ee 6. =A0So, it appears we need to= either repackage the 5.3.1 bundles to change the imports or create a speci= al snapshot version of activemq for the M1. =A0Any opinions on which way we= should be going with this?

Rick



--
Ivan
--0016364274e70df560048427a0fa--