Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rickmcg@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=OmtEsVpxyVJUG12ehywgL9gRE5j4IG7EHJGevBwtA7Ras7NrQ7Cby9EBxfGBTv4xPv
         S0k6+L7i0U1HOrcPiUdNRunnMbQc+LrvkkSwXbAODON4a16roXsbxk9lR0yE6dTQIHsJ
         zHNdWzoHNPowT24rexBf1oEJ9JhS6G0puaiBI=
Message-ID: <4BD56D91.7020500@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:40:17 -0400
From: Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rickmcg@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
References: <4BD03BFA.4030401@gmail.com>
 <C4ED8D7D-D355-4333-84D6-6B3739246123@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4ED8D7D-D355-4333-84D6-6B3739246123@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Forgot my +1 too.

On 4/25/2010 4:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
>
> --kevan
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>    
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications.  This is a single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.  In addition, the specs have been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions.  The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
>> of the projects.  All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.  All tag svn versions have been
>> successfully built.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email.  I apologize for the incovenience.
>>
>> The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>>     Source location:
>>      geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
>>      
>
>