Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rickmcg@gmail.com designates
 209.85.221.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=VZt4qwxRKTME1LslXjgLv7Wpq0yaDd/UtsW2mJLGKSjKLwTfMhPCSEnDEqtaKj9s4d
         FpKhCnTTY/tGca+tavF0VmKcCEMZyhjpoFFnQ1nJeIp6y/ldKlB01/8pUbcDfnnKxuQW
         hbz2RqdPF+LAByPXaSySfQZeppkJjrgjzekMs=
Message-ID: <4BC75C89.60507@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:35:53 -0400
From: Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rickmcg@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Geronimo Dev <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Subject: CANCELLED [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs
References: <4BC722CA.7090506@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BC722CA.7090506@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Because of concerns about how the version numbers got changed in the 
process of using a consistent numbering convention, this vote has been 
cancelled and new release candidates will be created.

Rick

On 4/15/2010 10:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications.  This is a 
> single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.  In addition, the specs 
> have been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions.  The RAT and IANAL plugins 
> have been run against
> of the projects.  All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>
>  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>  [ ] +1  approve
>  [ ] +0  no opinion
>  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
>  Staging repo:
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/ 
>
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list 
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the 
> email.  I apologize for the incovenience.
>
>  The following specs are being voted on
>
>  geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3
>  geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>  geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
>  geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.0.8
>
>     Source location:
>      geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.0.8
>
>  geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.1
>  geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1
>  geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1
>  geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>  geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.2
>  geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>  geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0.1
>  geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
>  geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not 
> been verified via TCK yet)
>
>