geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Possible build tweaks
Date Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:46:44 GMT
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:19 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I think our build is still perhaps more unwieldy than it needs to be.  I
> wonder if using the pom import scope more would help:
>
> 1. put some large sets of dependencies in dependency management such as in
> particular specs into separate "management only" poms


> 2. put versions of all the subprojects into dependency management of plugin
> poms... e.g. for connector_1.6 something like
>
>    <dependencyManagement>
>        <dependencies>
>
>            <!-- imports of other plugins -->
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.framework</groupId>
>                <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>                <type>pom</type>
>                <scope>import</scope>
>            </dependency>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.plugins</groupId>
>                <artifactId>j2ee</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>                <type>pom</type>
>                <scope>import</scope>
>            </dependency>
>
>            <!-- internal dependencies -->
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.configs</groupId>
>                <artifactId>client-transaction-1_6</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>            </dependency>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.configs</groupId>
>                <artifactId>connector-deployer-1_6</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>            </dependency>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.configs</groupId>
>                <artifactId>transaction-1_6</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>            </dependency>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.modules</groupId>
>                <artifactId>geronimo-connector-1_6</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>            </dependency>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.modules</groupId>
>                <artifactId>geronimo-connector-builder-1_6</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>            </dependency>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.modules</groupId>
>                <artifactId>geronimo-transaction-1_6</artifactId>
>                <version>${version}</version>
>            </dependency>
>            <!-- external dependencies -->
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.tranql</groupId>
>                <artifactId>tranql-connector</artifactId>
>                <version>1.6-SNAPSHOT</version>
>            </dependency>
>
>            <dependency>
>                <groupId>org.apache.aries.transaction</groupId>
>
>  <artifactId>org.apache.aries.transaction.blueprint</artifactId>
>                <version>0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
>            </dependency>
>        </dependencies>
>    </dependencyManagement>
>
>
> I think this makes the build more modular, makes clearer the relationships
> between plugins, and would be needed anyway should we decide to release
> plugins separately.
>

Agreed.


>
> What do other people think?
>

I ever thought that even the plugins are too heavy, Is it possible to split
the plugins into several groups  ?



>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message