Have the specs jars been tested in both a non osgi environment and an osgi
environment ?
Also, i'd like to have the scripting api and rest api osgi-fied the same
way. We'd need them in servicemix, and given you have rewritten the specs
to support osgi, i don't see the need to maintain the servicemix ones
anymore.
Also, I think there is an unresolved JIRA issue (GERONIMO-3960) about the
imported packages (they should not import their own packages).
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 19:30, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we wish to release a milestone soon, we need to start getting the
> different subcomponents released fairly quickly. Here are the things I
> believe we need to have release votes on:
>
> 1) New spec components. These need to be done first, and should probably
> done as a single vote rather than trying to schedule a vote for each of the
> jars.
> 2) New javamail jar (should probably done concurrently with the javamail
> spec).
> 3) New xmlbeans schema jar releases (java ee 1.4, java ee 5, and java ee 6
> versions)
> 4) New components jars
> 5) New yoko jars
> 6) New tomcat ext jars
>
> For 1), I think these are ready to go. I believe the issue of the package
> exports has been resolved as far as it can be for the 3.1 M1 release. The
> jpa and servlet specs will be exporting dual version levels because the need
> to line up with different implementations that are not conforming to the
> OSGi specs yet. This seems like a workable solution, at least for the short
> term. I believe all of our specs are currently passing the signature tests,
> so they look clean there. If I don't hear any objections, I'll start
> staging these for release tomorrow morning.
>
> The one spec there might be a concern about is the ccpp spec jar. This is
> used in the pluto support currently, but we don't currently have a TCK to
> validate this one. I need some opinions on how to proceed with that jar.
> For now, I'll not be submitting this one for a vote with the rest of the
> specs.
>
> What state are the rest of these in? I suspect yoko is not stable enough
> currently since David Jencks is currently working on getting the Corba
> support working. We might want to delay the tomcat external release as long
> as we can in case we require some patches. "As long as we can" is probably
> not more than a week. The xmlbeans schema jars are probably pretty stable
> and capable of being released now.
>
> Are the components in any shape that release votes can be started? Here
> are the components we need to release:
>
> - geronimo-connector
> - geronmo-transaction
> - geronimo-jaspi
>
> This will need to be handled fairly soon too.
>
> Rick
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
|