geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Date Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:09:09 GMT

On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information
properly. Thanks!
>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native
(i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client
configuration -- We
might want to consider updating...
>>>> A few questions:
>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed --
>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license
choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a
work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
> I just discovered something very useful to know.  You can delete directories from a 
Nexus staging repository after the item has been closed.  I've removed the jaxb-impl from
the staging area, and will rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote
for just jaxb-impl.  This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for jaxb-impl, which
will allow this to proceed without cancelling the entire vote.
> Rick
>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?

I'm ok with the rollback of jaxb-impl -- as long as it's clear what people are/have voted

JSTL has a CDDL license, also. Is it CDDL-only or dual licensed, also?

View raw message