geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Date Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:47:14 GMT
+1 after jaxb and jstl being removed from the vote.


-Donald


On 4/27/10 10:51 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> +1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote)
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the
>>>>> licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
>>>>> svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't
>>>>> define the file type in our recommended client configuration --
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html.
>>>>> We might want to consider updating...
>>>>>
>>>>> A few questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed
>>>>> (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>>      
>>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed --
>>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>>
>>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we
>>> indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license
>>> include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason
>>> not to use the same wording...
>>>    
>> I just discovered something very useful to know.  You can delete
>> directories from a  Nexus staging repository after the item has been
>> closed.  I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will
>> rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for
>> just jaxb-impl.  This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for
>> jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the
>> entire vote.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>>>     
>>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains
>>>>> both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed
>>>>> in the jar?
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
>>>>      
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>    
>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message