geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Date Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:51:22 GMT
+1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote)

-Donald


On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the
>>>> licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
>>>> svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't
>>>> define the file type in our recommended client configuration --
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html.
>>>> We might want to consider updating...
>>>>
>>>> A few questions:
>>>>
>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed
>>>> (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>      
>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed --
>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>
>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we
>> indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license
>> include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason
>> not to use the same wording...
>>    
> I just discovered something very useful to know.  You can delete
> directories from a  Nexus staging repository after the item has been
> closed.  I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will
> rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for
> just jaxb-impl.  This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for
> jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the
> entire vote.
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
>>>     
>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains
>>>> both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed
>>>> in the jar?
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
>>>      
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --kevan
>>    
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message