geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Date Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:03:47 GMT
On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> 1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
> Shouldn't it be -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
>
> 2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
> 4/16), so I did that for you.
>    
Thanks.  I remembered at one point that I needed to so that, but forgot 
to go back and do the actual trop.

> 3) The JPA spec below should be listed as geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1,
> based on the tag and files in the 007 staging repo.
>    

Unless I'm missing something, that's exactly how it IS listed.  I 
corrected the error of the last cycle to make this 1.1 not 1.2.

Rick
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>    
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications.  This is a
>> single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.  In addition, the specs have
>> been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions.  The RAT and IANAL plugins
>> have been run against
>> of the projects.  All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>> All tag svn versions have been
>> successfully built.
>>
>>   Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>>   [ ] +1  approve
>>   [ ] +0  no opinion
>>   [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>>   Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>> server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>> email.  I apologize for the incovenience.
>>
>>   The following specs are being voted on
>>
>>   geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>   geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
>>   geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>   geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>>   geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>>      Source location:
>>       geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>>   geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>   geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>   geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
>>   geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>   geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>   geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>   geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>   geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>>   geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>
>>      
>    


Mime
View raw message