geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Date Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:17:07 GMT
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Rick,
> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For
example:
>
> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
>
> jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.
>
> I'm also getting an unresolved dependency during build of geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1:
>
> Missing:
> ----------
> 1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-osgi-locator:jar:1.0
>    

This one is likely cause by not building the geronimo-osgi-locator 
project first.  I'm able to build this one ok if I build the other 
first.  The ejb and jaxb issues look like stop-release problems to me, 
unfortunately.

Rick

> Unless I'm able to build from source successfully, afraid I'm going to be -1 on these
releases. Can you or somebody else double check my results?
>
> --kevan
>
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>    
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications.  This is a single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.  In addition, the specs have been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions.  The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run
against
>> of the projects.  All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>   [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>    Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected
my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email.  I apologize
for the incovenience.
>>   The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>>     Source location:
>>      geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified
via TCK yet)
>>
>>      
>
>    


Mime
View raw message