geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)
Date Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:25:18 GMT
OK, as long as the old tag is removed, I'm good.

-Donald


On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A little confused here....
>>
>> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
>> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>>
>> Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
>> the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
>>     2.0_spec-1.0.1
>>     2.0_spec-1.2
>> But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo.  Looks like
>> you created the 1.0.1 tag -
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
>> line
>> [maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
>>    
> Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback.  I'll delete that.
> 
> 
>> Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
>> next version?
>>    
> This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the
> interactions with the release plugin.  I'd really prefer to not have to
> roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue.  I hope
> this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues
> from the previous vote.
> 
> Rick
> 
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>   
>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications.  This is a
>>> single vote
>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.  In addition, the specs have
>>> been updated
>>> with common support for OSGi interactions.  The RAT and IANAL plugins
>>> have been run against
>>> of the projects.  All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>>
>>>   Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>   [ ] +1  approve
>>>   [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>   [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>>   Staging repo:
>>>  
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>>
>>>   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>>
>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>>
>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>>> server rejected my
>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>>> email.  I apologize for the incovenience.
>>>
>>>   The following specs are being voted on
>>>
>>>   geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>>   geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>>   geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>>
>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>>
>>>   geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>>      Source location:
>>>       geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>>   geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>>   geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>>   geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>>>   geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>>   geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>>   geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>>   geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>>   geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>>
>>>   geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>    
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message