Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rwonly@gmail.com designates
 209.85.222.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=WchSrVwOBkt/03pCGz6iwWIEl2DfWGeaxzj3CGqQQkmvdSSZ7MWh3rvhjuhkhrxtVe
         GndrgOmX25+FKAZ5d03c5m46wZIdHPeU0pBXL965ASqN33S4iv3Kn0GQBwz7KGi26RkW
         lEluRYxxn+rr4l/r2LSl1r0QzBHUkITPjobqg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b5d96911003222357i1e9c7191r9e70d12338d73b86@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fbab58221003221934w7e4cba60i713488f790e8b251@mail.gmail.com>
	 <DCFF36EB-0DA1-467E-B36F-CC75ADACD6BE@gmail.com>
	 <b5d96911003222357i1e9c7191r9e70d12338d73b86@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:46:54 +0800
Message-ID: <fbab58221003231946n59ae36ffhd52313b3b8c392db@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: {DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?
From: Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ca9168f650048282f10c

--00504502ca9168f650048282f10c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

if no objections, I will revert the code today

Thanks

2010/3/23 Delos <daition@gmail.com>

> I agree, since Tomcat hasn't accepted the patch
>
> 2010/3/23 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>
>
>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>>
>> > Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon?
>> If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5,
>> I prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
>> >
>> > The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
>> > GERONIMO - 5128
>> > GERONIMO - 5129
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> I think that's reasonable. I'd rather not start adding additional function
>> that hasn't also been applied to Tomcat. So, unless the patch is accepted
>> soon, I'd be in favor of reverting the updates.
>>
>> --kevan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>


-- 
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org

--00504502ca9168f650048282f10c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

if no objections, I will revert the code today<br><br>Thanks<br><br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote">2010/3/23 Delos <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto=
:daition@gmail.com">daition@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid=
 rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I agree, since Tomcat hasn&#39;t accepted the patch<br><br><div class=3D"gm=
ail_quote">2010/3/23 Kevan Miller <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:k=
evan.miller@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">kevan.miller@gmail.com</a>&gt;</sp=
an><div>
<div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br>
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon?=
 If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.=
5, I prefer to remove Spnego support this time.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The related JIRAs that need to revert are:<br>
&gt; GERONIMO - 5128<br>
&gt; GERONIMO - 5129<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thoughts?<br>
<br>
</div>I think that&#39;s reasonable. I&#39;d rather not start adding additi=
onal function that hasn&#39;t also been applied to Tomcat. So, unless the p=
atch is accepted soon, I&#39;d be in favor of reverting the updates.<br>


<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--kevan</font></blockquote></div></div></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <=
br>Best Regards,<br><font color=3D"#888888"><br>Delos<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Lei Wang (Rex)<b=
r>rwonly AT <a href=3D"http://apache.org">apache.org</a><br>

--00504502ca9168f650048282f10c--