Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67227 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 02:50:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 02:50:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 503 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 02:49:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 325 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 02:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 317 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 02:49:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:49:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rwonly@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.179] (HELO mail-pz0-f179.google.com) (209.85.222.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:49:43 +0000 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so2060295pzk.25 for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:49:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QU76SxprG/x7+LSz9az2MHmxXSos5LmhKCXPyFQPyBk=; b=iyoegF43agg8fndFI9AnY4yDZiI5bYijGoqJXRjdAKmtU2Zx/91oUa6ADo2JawH8iC +IJjH5B+vkjdczD1FcTparv7wNY6eFiEViCwaqDjSRqCZ44Lp1+vTgFHOCjJcVnd/MRg VF++VzOeD9V9seP4qbtbWLdrv1Kvg9MGEdfxU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iHgMhgcwz00WB2IBIumfQxK74qlfWnpmcUyaWZBP/VUcl5LgVvCRuQc360uim2h1la aJNff5L8AZmeCB/oPcLn9uq3VD4Sl6bcSOUpRbN0Lh46o3Y+aM1s4dQMPFgLctj2dGlO PwDQiR3mwvsYo3gK3vHDjZJhJPU08NQHL8Cyk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.37 with SMTP id c37mr2816667wfj.172.1268016562155; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:49:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f744e41003071814s26e592b3x870839b5e6b69d20@mail.gmail.com> References: <0DC4527C-D21A-42ED-AAEE-D7704C448909@gmail.com> <43A809F6-9C0A-4809-915B-D472A1FE51C5@gmail.com> <4B8BC205.1000505@apache.org> <45f744e41003071814s26e592b3x870839b5e6b69d20@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:49:22 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try) From: Rex Wang To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501803bc1b2660481411c1e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504501803bc1b2660481411c1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Ivan, could you please help run the tck with the txmanager-2.1.4? 2010/3/8 Ivan > I have run all the TCK cases with geronimo-el 1.0.2, and all the cases > passed. Will update the version number in 2.1 branch later. > > 2010/3/1 Donald Woods > > Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions >> of the Java EE 5 specs. >> >> >> -Donald >> >> >> On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote: >> > What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on >> > Geronimo with el_spec of new version? >> > >> > 2010/3/1 Delos > >> > >> > >> > >> > 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller > > > >> > >> > >> > On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote: >> > >> > > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is >> > that enough? >> > >> > No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, >> > that hasn't happened. >> > >> > --kevan >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Delos >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Delos >> > > > > -- > Ivan > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org --00504501803bc1b2660481411c1e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Ivan, could you please help run the tck with the txmanager-2.1.4?
2010/3/8 Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com>
I have run all the TCK cases with geronimo-el 1.0.2, and all the cases pass= ed. Will update the version number in 2.1 branch later.

2010/3/1 Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>

Yes, that is what= we have done in the past before releasing new versions
of the Java EE 5 specs.


-Donald


On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote:
> What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a ful= l TCK on
> Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
>
> 2010/3/1 Delos <daition@gmail.com <mailto:daition@gmail.com>>
>
>
>
> =A0 =A0 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
> =A0 =A0 <mailto:kevan.miller@gmail.com>>
>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has pass= ed TCK test. Is
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 that enough?
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunde= rstood,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 that hasn't happened.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --kevan
>
>
>
>
> =A0 =A0 --
> =A0 =A0 Best Regards,
>
> =A0 =A0 Delos
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos



-- Ivan



--
Lei Wang (Rex)rwonly AT apache.org
--00504501803bc1b2660481411c1e--