Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22262 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2010 05:28:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2010 05:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 69914 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2010 05:28:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 69701 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2010 05:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 69694 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2010 05:28:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:28:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.54] (HELO mail-ww0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:27:59 +0000 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1024559wwb.13 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:27:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QNBYOAY7W4kgQgv2HnKuvLUgms7lVsTJLCWnkJ+Z61s=; b=avTlMOZvrPGxgvDn9un1mYWz3NmYj/P3iJbo/9PjQVQ9y2f84yfnDsQcQL6nrNHW7p y6rPIXYg5PwqS5P1aHRPR9ggTiZt4M7HVjwkuHR7n0e9ZIUbkkpQ1TeV8xe8r8cfwj6Z 5sv1faf0PF6tGpf3DmaFDLUJwq3lasIjYUGhQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I/uZbibSBm9n69QlSbIfJyiibeoGdsixK5OwrCzd/Qzze8iKs+fhyFRic0LzUlNXyS BtJJ0S+lntc3mfkpJaOVnCtTbmTbwnDQf5bfKNX6V8go2HhYnU2zrRM6cP9LyB2Lm558 Quyh09d7NlfFNzYRp4gtlmbPFnKr2qRpdvZJc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.132 with SMTP id u4mr286752wee.191.1268198858242; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:27:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:27:38 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: osgi core/compendium from felix or osgi? From: Guillaume Nodet To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FWIW, Felix has switched to using the OSGi ones and does not maintain its own versions of core / compendium anymore. On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:56, Lin Sun wrote: > I think there was a similar discussion on aries list last year, and we > decided to use the ones from osgi (which is more current and > official). > > Lin > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:04 PM, David Jencks wro= te: >> I noticed some comments on a felix list that I think indicated they thou= ght >> the core and compendium bundles from osgi were more appropriate to use t= han >> the ones from felix. >> >> Should we switch? =A0I have the changes locally =A0but thought I should = ask >> before applying them. >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> > --=20 Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com