Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15984 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 13:33:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 13:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 8091 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 13:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8046 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 13:33:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8039 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 13:33:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:33:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.13.42] (HELO smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.13.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:33:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 39850 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 13:32:54 -0000 Received: from cpe-174-099-058-061.nc.res.rr.com (dwoods@174.99.58.61 with plain) by smtp103.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Mar 2010 05:32:54 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: sCI.ryiswBB7FW.DxjU523c87MI- X-YMail-OSG: tq.GSkQVM1k5XN8RONEH0MKiiZyAmJC1P0kQ3u1r53iG0kfbo9BgMCQQyVm2Vsbove7nMhQN06DnZTzltoL1gAgdvj.JkqQy_hv6PnLESVaJSH1r2jk0LMuYfIV9PqMbZe0cA.pp97fKjnNp7DTo.9h8quri.N1qvC_LrVjyqX8f3csyN4_5HslOEunfP0PCT5lV62OOUZPF54nZDDsFN4T8W8Cvf8k9XB9QjOpxOKPjCHl1S7ENSMBmnESRXgOp9q31h5oTkkKetdSY4PnLTDEUOOUrZXs6YNKG9qmckV8WI5MkvRSMeDaYRIouHJTZv_ERHF5jpdcOdQ_mGbbDWbT3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4B8BC205.1000505@apache.org> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:32:53 -0500 From: Donald Woods User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try) References: <4B74B11B.8000403@apache.org> <0DC4527C-D21A-42ED-AAEE-D7704C448909@gmail.com> <43A809F6-9C0A-4809-915B-D472A1FE51C5@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions of the Java EE 5 specs. -Donald On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote: > What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on > Geronimo with el_spec of new version? > > 2010/3/1 Delos > > > > > 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller > > > > On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote: > > > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is > that enough? > > No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, > that hasn't happened. > > --kevan > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Delos > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Delos