Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31062 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2010 08:15:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2010 08:15:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 57006 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2010 08:15:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56941 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2010 08:15:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56933 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2010 08:15:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:15:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rwonly@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.184] (HELO mail-pz0-f184.google.com) (209.85.222.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:15:41 +0000 Received: by pzk14 with SMTP id 14so1009297pzk.3 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:15:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gkG0QybjjEyFS2oJkj//7mh1CIk85UXCYw1uyXdUGhI=; b=xEkpr1v694tZ+ON70K9zTZ6vby0gtuBRPxPN37ZaETamPQ0Y0BnchUiGqi0KJwmgdp A3LN9lcWj2AXICwCVp6bakXK1flgJ+h4YkAibsD9ZtHKTnsyqEGjrB3g8J0kpPEQBWyC TPKxmRqX7GwCxvFHe2uEip/MXrnAjSJpuOHSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HQeLAWYaegiosHR0acgN66PWLfAo+SudlUbICqBP0AODWClnVXFHIaBA5C03u9T6AF 9b6+k5GK885U8OJNOlmz5s04lB/p2FDBxfFTxYyTe5B/zuHkURtzvAmMMZyfJMUi+FUX tqOvkA5TI51TnRWcBJCa5brBclX6TR942AQw8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.20 with SMTP id u20mr2883047wfh.209.1265012121481; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:15:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f744e41002010001xeaf4c75scf070488aeff3b9e@mail.gmail.com> References: <5e7fd1eb1001290000w2b476572v1758fcc3925ac580@mail.gmail.com> <4B62EF43.9050508@apache.org> <45f744e41002010001xeaf4c75scf070488aeff3b9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:15:21 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rename the term "j2ee" to "javaee" or "jee" in G3.0? From: Rex Wang To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cc5e23344a047e8596cb --00504502cc5e23344a047e8596cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sure you can leave a message under when you finish. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5058 thanks 2010/2/1 Ivan > Hi, Rex > Currently, I am working on moving to javaee 6 xmlbeans, if possible, > could you please do the changes after I finish it ? > Thanks ! > > 2010/2/1 Rex Wang > > Thanks, will use "javaee". >> >> -Rex >> >> 2010/1/29 Donald Woods >> >> You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. We had several instances of the >>> "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of >>> the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-) >>> >>> For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we >>> need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with >>> the Sun guidelines. >>> >>> BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we want, as >>> they are internal variables/attribute names. >>> >>> >>> -Donald >>> >>> >>> On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote: >>> > I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or >>> "ee". >>> > >>> > -Jack >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang >> > > wrote: >>> > >>> > Good idea if following concerns are addressed: >>> > >>> > 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan. >>> > 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang >> > > wrote: >>> > >>> > hi, >>> > >>> > I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new >>> > Geronimo. >>> > There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin >>> > project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"... >>> > So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee? >>> > >>> > Any thoughts? >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Lei Wang (Rex) >>> > rwonly AT apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Shawn >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lei Wang (Rex) >> rwonly AT apache.org >> > > > > -- > Ivan > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org --00504502cc5e23344a047e8596cb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sure

you can leave a message under when you finish. https://issues.apache.org/j= ira/browse/GERONIMO-5058

thanks

2010/2/1 Ivan <xhh= sld@gmail.com>
Hi, Rex
=A0=A0=A0 Currently, I am working on moving to javaee 6 xmlbeans= , if possible, could you please=A0 do the changes after I finish it ?
= =A0=A0=A0 Thanks !

2010/2/1 Rex Wang <rwo= nly@gmail.com>

Thanks, will use = "javaee".

-Rex

2010/1/29= Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>

You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. =A0We had several instances of the<= br> "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminde= d of
the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-)

For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we
need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with
the Sun guidelines.

BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we wa= nt, as
they are internal variables/attribute names.


-Donald


On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe &= quot;javaee" or "ee".
>
> -Jack
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com
> <mailto:genspring@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 Good idea if following concerns are addressed:
>
> =A0 =A0 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan.<= br> > =A0 =A0 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change. >
>
> =A0 =A0 On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com
> =A0 =A0 <mailto:rwonly@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 hi,
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee&q= uot; in our new
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Geronimo.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 There are a lot of places using this term, such as plu= gin
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"...=
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee?
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Any thoughts?
>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lei Wang (Rex)
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> =A0 =A0 --
> =A0 =A0 Shawn
>
>


<= br>--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org



-- Ivan



--
Lei Wang (Rex)rwonly AT apache.org
--00504502cc5e23344a047e8596cb--