Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48527 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 10:03:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 10:03:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 60891 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 10:03:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60819 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 10:03:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60811 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 10:03:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:03:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of genspring@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:03:40 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so460102pzk.3 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:03:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HN1z2Mny02QtGXyLGAPozumtRai7+3ryh69+oFlpbQU=; b=UtRA5AU8StS/G65/cmxTGSTuosg7DgzybhX8SxC+2mJ0GaDJWziE1F/IYlufkTO/QE JEgh6h+JRE73M/xUZnXLc5fNogNby16lIi8w+B5koVUrmUDlEdx2nsYX4JYfp7BrTrE4 bVmruxRMv6eqFQzQxscDhujjpUE/tpsIFPN94= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FOYiWi6bCC/z1EWgbam0ABc8C61cbYHG2FETpnVDzSTBdkwXYFjgBlka0Hay9wYI0g 1CSnDPAG2waTCajPMvZHsQPWYcCDZxxIOzQUKtbzbHaG4DY+XsjgYRc+9moA4zsTN8Dl bJNxZQj+t4xWBYrSSBD5l7rcCFARx1IIEkFhE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.82.42 with SMTP id f42mr2173976rvb.163.1266919398904; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:03:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5e7fd1eb1002220051x290e689en7eae9fb6ea5ca7da@mail.gmail.com> <14af40511002220138v415aa0ebi33758f3053ed1074@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:03:18 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]Include Tomcat 6.0.25 in Geronimo 2.1.5? From: Shawn Jiang To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1549ebb1295048041a808 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1549ebb1295048041a808 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I guess we can upgrade the tomcat to patched 6.0.25 and then rerun the full geronimo server TCK to see if everything is still OK. Maybe rerun the full TCK test all component to be released(like EL spec) too so that we can get TCK result for all of them? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Delos wrote: > Thanks Jack and Ashish! > > Could anyone tell me what we need to before we launch a voting for the > patched tomcat? Do we need to do a TCK test for tomcat by ourselves? > > Thanks in advance! > > 2010/2/22 Ashish Jain > > Yes as jack said it is always good to have the latest one plus we may also >> get the spnego code in tomcat. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jack Cai wrote: >> >>> Sure, let's keep most current. >>> >>> -Jack >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Delos wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Since tomcat 6.0.25 will release this week, shall we include it in >>>> Geronimo 2.1.5? >>>> >>>> See the mail from tomcat dev list >>>> http://old.nabble.com/Timing-for-6.0.25--to27607159.html#a27607159 >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Delos >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Delos > -- Shawn --000e0cd1549ebb1295048041a808 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess we can upgrade the tomcat to patched 6.0.25 and then rerun the full= geronimo server TCK to see if everything is still OK.

Maybe rerun t= he full TCK test all component to be released(like EL spec) too so that we = can get TCK result for all of them?

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Delos <daition@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Jack and Ashish!

Could anyone tell me what we nee= d to before we launch a voting for the patched tomcat? Do we need to do a T= CK test for tomcat by ourselves?

Thanks in advance= !

2010/2/22 Ashish Jain <= ashjain2@gmail.com<= /a>>

Yes as jack said it is always good to have the latest one plus we may also = get the spnego code in tomcat.


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jack Cai <= greensight@gmail.= com> wrote:
Sure, let's k= eep most current.

-Jack


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:42 PM, De= los <daition@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Since tomcat 6.0.25 will release this week, shall we= include it in Geronimo 2.1.5?

See the mail from t= omcat dev list

Thanks!

= --
Best Regards,

Delos





-- Best Regards,

Delos



--
Shawn
--000e0cd1549ebb1295048041a808--