Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79606 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 07:48:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 07:48:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 37801 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 07:48:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 37719 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 07:48:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 37710 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 07:48:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:48:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cgurkanerdogdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.227] (HELO mail-ew0-f227.google.com) (209.85.219.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:47:54 +0000 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2415098ewy.38 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:47:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+CsdsIuOPkstBj9138z/+b+ii3AqkHcPVasjDLYLwgo=; b=YnNjXTLD84WlYQZG44dJ5dmTTXg2Lhl3JlovGmID9CXkeWqcX0catuHrKFcJWjrrX8 aDw0mwgND+ZCpOjt7bLXH6QVyhRCTTPQ5vCE7UtgnCHCrppTLfhtr7BJIblizPLdglWE C2VSB+3RYb1J/FPgw5Uq4mjFGZ3UUGPCKxttw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LmYcYQC2XTHMJHjFHjzlBgkQ7ubhRkSzO/0oldnHqeodujARAAKQ12zn6xCk78ERNM Rzgg4ET63dSH0HoFSqVNB0XKBEODt1qw6TD0t4ud46tcFCBSGVyQZnFJaDwqnHY3cB+T gLqZLxasuZxBGjAJ0zUw06u0oKkckmwOic4Io= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.50.203 with SMTP id a11mr792385ebg.76.1265269653613; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:47:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <695522.67681.qm@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <144915.32477.qm@web38205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <265733.49141.qm@web38205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4B682F16.3050909@apache.org> <73813.33770.qm@web38201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4B68E9C7.9090300@apache.org> <209750.68705.qm@web38201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <73D97154-559D-4D1F-8D52-CF75EA657660@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:47:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? From: Gurkan Erdogdu To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636256e813faf01047ec18cf5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636256e813faf01047ec18cf5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>> I'm not that happy releasing specs until the implementaition (e.g. openWebBeans) passes its tck Then, how could we release our internal milestones without releasing spec. = ? Thanks; --Gurkan 2010/2/4 David Jencks > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > Hi David; > > I have found some wrong ordering and wrong serialize id. I will correct > those in the afternoon and patch it. Donald has already started a vote. D= oes > this problem blocks the beta- release ? > > > I'll certainly vote -1 on a non-snapshot with known problems, and I hope > everyone else will too. I'm not that happy releasing specs until the > implementaition (e.g. openWebBeans) passes its tck, since we have found > subtle implementation problems in specs in the past. > > Many thanks for taking a look for these problems, better to look and fix > now than on day 3 of the vote :-) > > thanks > david jencks > > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > 2010/2/4 David Jencks > >> Gurkan, >> >> We've recently found a couple more gotchas to check beyond the tck.... >> could you check these by hand? Having them wrong obviously impedes >> interoperability :-) >> >> 1. all serializable classes have the serialVersionUID as specified in th= e >> javadoc >> 2. any enums are specified in the order in the javadoc "Enum constant >> detail" and NOT that in "Enum constant summary" >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> >> On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >> >> That seems OK, It passed signature test. >> >> --Gurkan >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Donald Woods >> *To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org >> *Cc:* Gurkan Erdogdu ; >> dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> *Sent:* Wed, February 3, 2010 5:13:11 AM >> *Subject:* Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> >> OK, the patch has been applied and new snapshots published. >> Can you (or Blevins) run the signature tests against the latest >> snapshots (jcdi, atinject and interceptor) and if everything passes >> (please post the confirmation to our TCK list at >> geronimo-tck@geronimo.apache.org) I'll create release candidates for >> them tomorrow? >> >> Also, can you verify that the following are the correct dependencies, as >> we have a geronimo-el_2.2_spec for Java EE 6 - >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs >> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT >> provided >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs >> geronimo-el_1.0_spec >> 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT >> provided >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs >> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec >> 1.0-SNAPSHOT >> provided >> >> >> >> -Donald >> >> On 2/2/10 2:11 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >> > Hi Donald; >> > >> > Thanks for the response. I have attached patch to >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5101. >> > >> > We have a plan to release OpenWebBeans this week as soon as possible >> > that you release geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec and its dependents specs. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > --Gurkan >> > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >> > *From:* Donald Woods >> > *To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org >> > *Cc:* Gurkan Erdogdu ; >> dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> > *Sent:* Tue, February 2, 2010 3:56:38 PM >> > *Subject:* Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> > >> > For the geronimo spec api, if you open a JIRA and attach the patch, on= e >> > of us will get it committed and built for you. Once you verify that t= he >> > new jar passes the signature tests, we'll start a release vote.... >> > >> > >> > -Donald >> > >> > >> > On 2/1/10 4:35 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >> >> Moreover, I have to update API to pass CDI TCK signature tests. >> >> Currently it fails. Is it possible to give me a commit access to jcdi >> >> and atinject projects? >> >> >> >> --Gurkan >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Gurkan Erdogdu > > > >> >> *To:* dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> > ; dev@geronimo.apache.org >> > >> >> *Cc:* dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> >> *Sent:* Mon, February 1, 2010 11:05:10 PM >> >> *Subject:* Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> >> >> >> Hello,.addInterceptorBinding(java.lang.Class> >> java.lang.annotation.Annotation>) >> >> >> >> This is also required for geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec, currently we >> >> use 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT >> >> >> >> >> >> --Gurkan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Mark Struberg >> > >> >> >> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >> > > >> >> Cc: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> > > >> >> >> Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:54:16 PM >> >> Subject: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> >> >> >> Hi folks! >> >> >> >> We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will do a release of OpenWebBeans >> >> Milestone 4 in the next days and need our API to be release also. >> >> >> >> Can anyone please be so kind and do the release of a milestone of the >> >> jcdi-spec-1.0 for us? >> >> >> >> txs in advance and LieGrue, >> >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> >> Yahoo! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD! http://yahoo.com.tr >> >> =DDnternet =FCzerindeki en iyi i=E7eri=F0i Yahoo! T=FCrkiye sizlere s= unuyor! >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD! >> >> Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=FCrkiye'de! >> >> www.yahoo.com.tr >> > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >> > Yahoo! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD! >> > Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=FCrkiye'de! >> > www.yahoo.com.tr >> >> ------------------------------ >> Yahoo! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD! >> Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=FCrkiye'de! >> www.yahoo.com.tr >> >> >> > > > -- > Gurkan Erdogdu > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > --=20 Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com --001636256e813faf01047ec18cf5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>> I'm not that happy releasing specs until the implementaiti= on (e.g. openWebBeans) passes its tck
Then, how could we release our int= ernal milestones without releasing spec. ?

Thanks;

--Gurkan
2010/2/4 David Jencks <= david_jencks@yahoo.com>

On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:49 PM= , Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

Hi David;
I have found some wrong ordering and wrong serialize id. I will correct th= ose in the afternoon and patch it. Donald has already started a vote. Does = this problem blocks the beta- release ?

I'll certainly vote -1 on a non-snaps= hot with known problems, and I hope everyone else will too. =A0I'm not = that happy releasing specs until the implementaition (e.g. openWebBeans) pa= sses its tck, since we have found subtle implementation problems in specs i= n the past.=A0

Many thanks for taking a look for these problems, bette= r to look and fix now than on day 3 of the vote :-)

thanks
david jencks


Thanks;

--Gurkan

2010/2/4 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com&g= t;
Gurkan,
We've recently found a couple more gotchas to check bey= ond the tck.... could you check these by hand? =A0Having them wrong obvious= ly impedes interoperability :-)

1. all serializable classes have the serialVersionUID = as specified in the javadoc
2. any enums are specified in the order in t= he javadoc "Enum constant detail" and NOT that in "Enum cons= tant summary"

thanks
david jencks
<= div>

On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu= wrote:

That seems OK, It passed signature t= est.

--Gurkan

From:=A0Donald Woods <= ;dwoods@apache.org>
To:=A0dev@geronimo.apache.= org
Cc:=A0Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>;=A0dev@openwebbeans.apache.org<= /a>
Sent:=A0Wed,= February 3, 2010 5:13:11 AM
Subje= ct:=A0Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_sp= ec ?

OK, the patch has been applied and new snapshots published.
= Can you (or Blevins) run the signature tests against the latest
snapshot= s (jcdi, atinject and interceptor) and if everything passes
(please post= the confirmation to our TCK list at
gero= nimo-tck@geronimo.apache.org) I'll create release candidates forthem tomorrow?

Also, can you verify that the following are the corr= ect dependencies, as
we have a geronimo-el_2.2_spec for Java EE 6 -

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <= dependency>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <groupId>org.apache.geronim= o.specs</groupId>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <artifactId>geroni= mo-interceptor_1.1_spec</artifactId>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <scope>provided</scope>
=A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 </dependency>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <dependency>
=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <artifactId>geronimo-el_1.0_spec</artifac= tId>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <version>1.0.2-SNAPSHOT</versio= n>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <scope>provided</scope>
=A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 </dependency>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <dependency>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</group= Id>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_s= pec</artifactId>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <version>1.0-SNAPSH= OT</version>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <scope>provided</sco= pe>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 </dependency>


-Donald

On 2/2/10 2:= 11 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi Donald;
>=A0
= > Thanks for the response. I have attached patch to=A0
&= gt;=A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-51= 01.
>=A0
> We have a plan to release OpenWebBeans this w= eek as soon as possible
> that you release geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec and= its dependents=A0 specs.
>=A0
> Thanks
>=A0
> --Gurkan
>=A0
> ----------------------------= --------------------------------------------
> *From:* Donald Woods &= lt;dwoods@apache.org= >
> *To:*=A0dev@geronimo.apache.org
> *Cc:* Gurkan Erdogdu <<= a href=3D"mailto:gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com" target=3D"_blank">gurkanerdogdu@y= ahoo.com>;=A0dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> *Sent:* Tue, February 2, 2010 3:56:38 PM
> *Subject:* Re: miles= tone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
>=A0
> Fo= r the geronimo spec api, if you open a JIRA and attach the patch, one
> of us will get it committed and built for you.=A0 Once you verify that= the
> new jar passes the signature tests, we'll start a release= vote....
>=A0
>=A0
> -Donald >=A0
>=A0
> On 2/1/10 4:35 PM, Gur= kan Erdogdu wrote:
>> Moreover, I have to update API to pass CDI = TCK signature tests.
>> Currently it fails. Is it possible to give= me a commit access to jcdi
>> and atinject projects?
>>
>> --Gurkan
>&g= t;
>> ------------------------------------------------------------= ------------
>> *From:* Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> <mailto:gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>>
>> *To:*=A0dev@openwebbe= ans.apache.org
> <mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>;=A0dev@geronimo.apache.org> <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
>> *Cc:*=A0dev@openwebbeans.apache.org=A0<mai= lto:dev@op= enwebbeans.apache.org>
>> *Sent:* Mon, February 1, 2010 11:05:10 PM
>> *Subject:* = Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
>>
>> H= ello,.addInterceptorBinding(java.lang.Class<? extends
>> java.l= ang.annotation.Annotation>)
>>
>> This is also required for geronimo-interceptor_1.1_sp= ec, currently we
>> use 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>>=
>> --Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>> _____= ___________________________
>> From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de=A0<mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>
>= <mailto:struberg= @yahoo.de=A0<mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>>>
>> To:=A0dev@geronimo.apache.org=A0<mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.= org>
> <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org=A0<mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>&= gt;
>> Cc:=A0dev@openwebbeans.apache.org=A0<mailt= o:dev@open= webbeans.apache.org>
> <mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org=A0<mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apa= che.org>>
>> Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:54:16 PM
>> Subject: mile= stone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
>>
>> Hi folks!=
>>
>> We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will do a relea= se of OpenWebBeans
>> Milestone 4 in the next days and need our API to be release also.=
>>
>> Can anyone please be so kind and do the release of= a milestone of the
>> jcdi-spec-1.0 for us?
>>
>&g= t; txs in advance and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>=A0 =A0 =A0 ____________= _______________________________________________________
>> Yahoo! = T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD!=A0=A0http://yahoo.com.tr
>> =DDnternet =FCzerindeki en iyi i=E7eri=F0i Yahoo! T=FCrkiye sizle= re sunuyor!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------= ---------------------------------
>> Yahoo! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD= !
>> Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=FCrkiye'= de!
>>=A0www.yahoo.com.tr=A0<http://www.yahoo.com.tr> <<= a href=3D"http://tr.yahoo.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://tr.yahoo.com/&= gt;
>=A0
> ---------------------------------------------= ---------------------------
> Yahoo! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD!
> = Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=FCrkiye'de!
&= gt;=A0ww= w.yahoo.com.tr=A0<http://tr.yahoo.com/>

Yaho= o! T=FCrkiye a=E7=FDld=FD!
Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo= ! T=FCrkiye'de!
w= ww.yahoo.com.tr

<= br>

--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com




--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
--001636256e813faf01047ec18cf5--