Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78570 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 07:42:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 07:42:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 32601 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 07:42:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32503 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 07:42:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32495 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 07:42:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:42:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.58] (HELO smtp103.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:41:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 13125 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 07:41:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=y0v6FgcnhxaNVDoQXWbPCVQu5XUPrg1OwvG6VUgRasiPskey88J+FrpB6q2DhBaDCzQxg4F7xQmlIcBX2gSxTztv87hieRFfIL64eJJkqtnOrc+0WMUhyYiHT8gsrkoyqDZOoxIGBSk5KrdAKD2hEkcS4MEW+pzJVYpoaUM9ar0= ; Received: from 076-076-148-215.pdx.net (david_jencks@76.76.148.215 with plain) by smtp103.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Feb 2010 23:41:34 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- X-YMail-OSG: qx222tEVM1lzFAjFV6VIG0SyQQzttJKUDrIHUuEjE3VUaifAuN26AOlev61SAEyirPuR8TrCGeLNi7SJGufRwE50lW77uSWVKV9WWzBjOkWjhBEXubuVvqjtstO_I3k99vScWJAMrFWw9tXI.Zp9tvZ.Nmdwp.nmOAljs_DEUht.UbuchMSrKDE9Bl.gA_G1BUGHUc2dP0jcKFVLJD6wVnY0m93hsK8Y24vmZTWheW3fFHeIpjoZeQ_GuLr35s1fAZPjOKX0pJO42JPeNFeVeo.qWAShCflpJHH8xoL0tEfmiyP8u7XCUjmgPsV02fV8Pi.TB7LVtvoO0LPl4BY7u7Pc8r2WZZMZ5ut3LrX3MI_gNHzO59WC2iad_DDQa0GK2K0DWjf2Inlh1dxT.zsJslymDl7PL2O8rOkBBjVb6kVUZjQL0OuhFYH1axCJFZ1JTZUpyQ9QikxFOlZfYWnV7eUZ3FB4C98krhyOrzf828CIRc.9tBUimCMnb5VNmnFY X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-Id: From: David Jencks To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-11--800715032 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:41:33 -0800 References: <695522.67681.qm@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <144915.32477.qm@web38205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <265733.49141.qm@web38205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4B682F16.3050909@apache.org> <73813.33770.qm@web38201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4B68E9C7.9090300@apache.org> <209750.68705.qm@web38201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <73D97154-559D-4D1F-8D52-CF75EA657660@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-11--800715032 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi David; > > I have found some wrong ordering and wrong serialize id. I will =20 > correct those in the afternoon and patch it. Donald has already =20 > started a vote. Does this problem blocks the beta- release ? I'll certainly vote -1 on a non-snapshot with known problems, and I =20 hope everyone else will too. I'm not that happy releasing specs until =20= the implementaition (e.g. openWebBeans) passes its tck, since we have =20= found subtle implementation problems in specs in the past. Many thanks for taking a look for these problems, better to look and =20 fix now than on day 3 of the vote :-) thanks david jencks > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > 2010/2/4 David Jencks > Gurkan, > > We've recently found a couple more gotchas to check beyond the =20 > tck.... could you check these by hand? Having them wrong obviously =20= > impedes interoperability :-) > > 1. all serializable classes have the serialVersionUID as specified =20 > in the javadoc > 2. any enums are specified in the order in the javadoc "Enum =20 > constant detail" and NOT that in "Enum constant summary" > > thanks > david jencks > > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > >> That seems OK, It passed signature test. >> >> --Gurkan >> >> From: Donald Woods >> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >> Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu ; = dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 5:13:11 AM >> Subject: Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> >> OK, the patch has been applied and new snapshots published. >> Can you (or Blevins) run the signature tests against the latest >> snapshots (jcdi, atinject and interceptor) and if everything passes >> (please post the confirmation to our TCK list at >> geronimo-tck@geronimo.apache.org) I'll create release candidates for >> them tomorrow? >> >> Also, can you verify that the following are the correct =20 >> dependencies, as >> we have a geronimo-el_2.2_spec for Java EE 6 - >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs >> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT >> provided >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs >> geronimo-el_1.0_spec >> 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT >> provided >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.specs >> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec >> 1.0-SNAPSHOT >> provided >> >> >> >> -Donald >> >> On 2/2/10 2:11 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >> > Hi Donald; >> > >> > Thanks for the response. I have attached patch to >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5101. >> > >> > We have a plan to release OpenWebBeans this week as soon as =20 >> possible >> > that you release geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec and its dependents specs. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > --Gurkan >> > >> > =20 >> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > *From:* Donald Woods >> > *To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org >> > *Cc:* Gurkan Erdogdu ; = dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> > *Sent:* Tue, February 2, 2010 3:56:38 PM >> > *Subject:* Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> > >> > For the geronimo spec api, if you open a JIRA and attach the =20 >> patch, one >> > of us will get it committed and built for you. Once you verify =20 >> that the >> > new jar passes the signature tests, we'll start a release vote.... >> > >> > >> > -Donald >> > >> > >> > On 2/1/10 4:35 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >> >> Moreover, I have to update API to pass CDI TCK signature tests. >> >> Currently it fails. Is it possible to give me a commit access to =20= >> jcdi >> >> and atinject projects? >> >> >> >> --Gurkan >> >> >> >> =20 >> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Gurkan Erdogdu > > > >> >> *To:* dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> > ; dev@geronimo.apache.org >> > >> >> *Cc:* dev@openwebbeans.apache.org = > > >> >> *Sent:* Mon, February 1, 2010 11:05:10 PM >> >> *Subject:* Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> >> >> >> Hello,.addInterceptorBinding(java.lang.Class> >> java.lang.annotation.Annotation>) >> >> >> >> This is also required for geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec, =20 >> currently we >> >> use 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT >> >> >> >> >> >> --Gurkan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Mark Struberg >> > >> >> >> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >> > > >> >> Cc: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org = > > >> > > >> >> >> Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:54:16 PM >> >> Subject: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? >> >> >> >> Hi folks! >> >> >> >> We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will do a release of =20 >> OpenWebBeans >> >> Milestone 4 in the next days and need our API to be release also. >> >> >> >> Can anyone please be so kind and do the release of a milestone =20 >> of the >> >> jcdi-spec-1.0 for us? >> >> >> >> txs in advance and LieGrue, >> >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> =20 >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> >> Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1! http://yahoo.com.tr >> >> =C4=B0nternet =C3=BCzerindeki en iyi i=C3=A7eri=C4=9Fi Yahoo! = T=C3=BCrkiye sizlere =20 >> sunuyor! >> >> >> >> =20 >> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1! >> >> Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye'de! >> >> www.yahoo.com.tr >> > >> > =20 >> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1! >> > Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye'de! >> > www.yahoo.com.tr >> >> Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1! >> Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye'de! >> www.yahoo.com.tr > > > > > --=20 > Gurkan Erdogdu > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com --Apple-Mail-11--800715032 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 3, 2010, = at 10:49 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

Hi = David;

I have found some wrong ordering and wrong serialize id. I = will correct those in the afternoon and patch it. Donald has already = started a vote. Does this problem blocks the beta- release = ?

I'll certainly vote -1 on a = non-snapshot with known problems, and I hope everyone else will too. =  I'm not that happy releasing specs until the implementaition (e.g. = openWebBeans) passes its tck, since we have found subtle implementation = problems in specs in the past. 

Many = thanks for taking a look for these problems, better to look and fix now = than on day 3 of the vote = :-)

thanks
david = jencks


Thanks;
=
--Gurkan

2010/2/4 David Jencks = <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Gurkan,

We've recently found a couple more = gotchas to check beyond the tck.... could you check these by hand? =  Having them wrong obviously impedes interoperability = :-)

1. all serializable classes have the = serialVersionUID as specified in the javadoc
2. any enums are = specified in the order in the javadoc "Enum constant detail" and NOT = that in "Enum constant summary"

thanks
david jencks


On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:09 AM, = Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

That seems OK, It passed signature = test.

--Gurkan

From: Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: Gurkan = Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>; dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Wed, = February 3, 2010 5:13:11 AM
Subject: Re: milestone release of = geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?

OK, the patch has been applied = and new snapshots published.
Can you (or Blevins) run the signature = tests against the latest
snapshots (jcdi, atinject and interceptor) = and if everything passes
(please post the confirmation to our TCK = list at
geronimo-tck@geronimo.apache.org) I'll create = release candidates for
them tomorrow?

Also, can you verify = that the following are the correct dependencies, as
we have a = geronimo-el_2.2_spec for Java EE 6 -

        = <dependency>
            = <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
  =           = <artifactId>geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec</artifactId>
=             = <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
      =       <scope>provided</scope>
  =       </dependency>
        = <dependency>
            = <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
  =           = <artifactId>geronimo-el_1.0_spec</artifactId>
  =           = <version>1.0.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
      =       <scope>provided</scope>
  =       </dependency>
        = <dependency>
            = <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
  =           = <artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId>
  =           = <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
      =       <scope>provided</scope>
  =       </dependency>


-Donald

On = 2/2/10 2:11 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi = Donald;
> 
> Thanks for the response. I = have attached patch to 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5101.=
> 
> We have a plan to release = OpenWebBeans this week as soon as possible
> that you release = geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec and its dependents  = specs.
> 
> = Thanks
> 
> = --Gurkan
> 
> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------> *From:* Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
> = *To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org
> *Cc:* Gurkan = Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>; dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> *Sent:* Tue, = February 2, 2010 3:56:38 PM
> *Subject:* Re: milestone release of = geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
> 
> For the = geronimo spec api, if you open a JIRA and attach the patch, one
> = of us will get it committed and built for you.  Once you verify = that the
> new jar passes the signature tests, we'll start a = release = vote....
> 
> 
> = -Donald
> 
> 
> On = 2/1/10 4:35 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>> Moreover, I have to = update API to pass CDI TCK signature tests.
>> Currently it = fails. Is it possible to give me a commit access to jcdi
>> and = atinject projects?
>>
>> --Gurkan
= >>
>> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------>> *From:* Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> <mailto:gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>>
>> = *To:* dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> <mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>; <= a href=3D"mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org" = target=3D"_blank">dev@geronimo.apache.org
> <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
>> = *Cc:* dev@openwebbeans.apache.org <ma= ilto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>> = *Sent:* Mon, February 1, 2010 11:05:10 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: = milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
>>
>> = Hello,.addInterceptorBinding(java.lang.Class<? extends
>> = java.lang.annotation.Annotation>)
>>
>> This is = also required for geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec, currently = we
>> use = 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>>
>> = --Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>> = ________________________________
>> From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>
> <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>>>
>> = To: dev@geronimo.apache.org <mailto= :dev@geronimo.apache.org>
> <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org <mailto= :dev@geronimo.apache.org>>
>> = Cc: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org <ma= ilto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> = <mailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org <ma= ilto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>>
>> = Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:54:16 PM
>> Subject: milestone = release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
>>
>> Hi = folks!
>>
>> We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will = do a release of OpenWebBeans
>> Milestone 4 in the next days = and need our API to be release also.
>>
>> Can anyone = please be so kind and do the release of a milestone of the
>> = jcdi-spec-1.0 for us?
>>
>> txs in advance and = LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>  =     = ___________________________________________________________________
>= ;> Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1!  <= a href=3D"http://yahoo.com.tr" = target=3D"_blank">http://yahoo.com.tr
>> =C4=B0nternet = =C3=BCzerindeki en iyi i=C3=A7eri=C4=9Fi Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye sizlere = sunuyor!
>>
>> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------>> Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1!
>> Haber, = Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye'de!
= >> www.yahoo.com.tr <http://www.yahoo.com.tr> <http://tr.yahoo.com/>
= > 
> = ------------------------------------------------------------------------> Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1!
> Haber, = Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! = T=C3=BCrkiye'de!
> www.yahoo.com.tr <http://tr.yahoo.com/>
=

Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye a=C3=A7=C4=B1ld=C4=B1!
Haber, = Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! T=C3=BCrkiye'de!
www.yahoo.com.tr
=

<= br>

--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.c= om

= --Apple-Mail-11--800715032--