geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Rename the term "j2ee" to "javaee" or "jee" in G3.0?
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:09:36 GMT
Thanks, will use "javaee".

-Rex

2010/1/29 Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>

> You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE.  We had several instances of the
> "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of
> the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-)
>
> For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we
> need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with
> the Sun guidelines.
>
> BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we want, as
> they are internal variables/attribute names.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> > I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or
> "ee".
> >
> > -Jack
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com
> > <mailto:genspring@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Good idea if following concerns are addressed:
> >
> >     1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan.
> >     2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change.
> >
> >
> >     On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:rwonly@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         hi,
> >
> >         I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new
> >         Geronimo.
> >         There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin
> >         project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"...
> >         So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee?
> >
> >         Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >         --
> >         Lei Wang (Rex)
> >         rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Shawn
> >
> >
>



-- 
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org

Mime
View raw message