geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Rename the term "j2ee" to "javaee" or "jee" in G3.0?
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:08:15 GMT
2010/1/29 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>

> I think "j2eeType" in object names and abstract names mapped to object
> names is a literal specified in jsr77 so we shouldn't change it.
>
OK, I see..


> I'd be OK with javaee or ee in package names as long as we are sure it
> won't disrupt anyones ongoing development.  So if you want to do this please
> figure out all the places that will change and make sure no one is working
> on them.
>
OK, I will open a jira and provide a patch first.

Thanks
-Rex


>
> Since this is a non-functional change I tend to consider it less important
> than getting all of the 2.2 functionality working in 3.0 and getting all of
> aries functionality integrated.  However, it would be nice to have more up
> to date names.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>
> I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or
> "ee".
>
> -Jack
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good idea if following concerns are addressed:
>>
>> 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan.
>> 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new Geronimo.
>>> There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin project names,
>>> artifact names, "j2eeType"...
>>> So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee?
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lei Wang (Rex)
>>> rwonly AT apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org

Mime
View raw message