geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Delos <dait...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Date Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:50:01 GMT
Could any PMC member help to review it?Thanks!

在 2010年2月12日 下午10:45,Delos <daition@gmail.com>写道:

> Seems Ivan hasn't seen the update. Could any other PMC member help to take
> a look at this? Thanks a lot!
>
> 在 2010年2月12日 上午9:38,Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>写道:
>
> +1  Updates look good.
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 2/11/10 9:36 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> > OK. Looks good now.
>> >
>> > Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were
>> > changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates.
>> > Also, will be waiting on TCK results.
>> >
>> > --kevan
>> >
>> > On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Delos wrote:
>> >
>> >> extend the voting for more people to look at it
>> >>
>> >> 在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14,Delos <daition@gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:daition@gmail.com>>写道:
>> >>
>> >>     The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have
>> >>     recreated it in
>> >>
>> >>     Staging repo:
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
>> >>
>> >>     In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C
>> >>     and OMG can be removed, since they're already in the common
>> >>     LICENSE file of geronimo specs. So the tag content should be right.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>     在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26,Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>> >>     <mailto:kevan.miller@gmail.com>>写道:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>         The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source
>> >>         distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source
>> >>         distribution). IMO, the source distribution is correct (and
>> >>         this is what we are really voting on). However, IMO the
>> >>         subversion tag should match the contents of your source
>> >>         distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>> >>
>> >>         Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source,
>> >>         signatures/checksums, build.
>> >>
>> >>         --kevan
>> >>
>> >>         On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>         Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL(Expression
>> >>>         Language)1.0 Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing
>> >>>         and some el related testcases.
>> >>>
>> >>>         Staging repo:
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>> >>>
>> >>>         The svn location is here:
>> >>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>         Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>>         [ ] +1  approve
>> >>>         [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >>>         [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>>
>> >>>         --
>> >>>         Best Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>>         Delos
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     Best Regards,
>> >>
>> >>     Delos
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Delos
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Delos

Mime
View raw message