Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99212 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2009 03:30:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2009 03:30:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2823 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 03:30:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 2704 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 03:30:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 2696 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2009 03:30:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:30:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhhsld@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.201] (HELO mail-qy0-f201.google.com) (209.85.221.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:30:13 +0000 Received: by qyk39 with SMTP id 39so440380qyk.27 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:29:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=T+tBI2uKMzlzGHFXSdaYfeKcbxPKbEmlN5bCLBBSD1s=; b=NdKs+4Rz305DcCx+QbwqcAtMvP6Ek1nK8Z9Lf3WnonaDTxs19p5rsFGS+c1iaJy6N0 4pqMgh1mgO1fqc4VKwJVHXAv+boRnkDsaneLBDwPbaWCBhkQECTm2Jah5wXBbkhsjqSn HSVaC8oVPjgZmzzJX3W+uLBF1NY31yTEydohc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VK2SuTkGb9k6bljsEECdGwR7rdMqJe+KmZBOa8It/mwzC34b6/DZXOzcjw0bhJXdIZ 7VbttOp3M6msZXmcwddhocUhB2Od+4soWuFEDK53i5SeAYqbf1S1cLFMFFFMBXkVDFr4 sk4PiwfmuQxqKHWDhqQRCUVeuXjUawk6GmZmI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.11.147 with SMTP id t19mr144756qct.28.1259810992697; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:29:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:29:52 +0800 Message-ID: <45f744e40912021929m79aaede1nb841bb54cf9960fe@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Keep the same convention of import/export packages From: Ivan To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee872b431920479ca9a44 --0016364ee872b431920479ca9a44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Currently, Geronimo uses many third-parties bundles (like pubished by ServiceMix), also publishes some bundles by our own. So, whether importing and exporting the packages at the same time, I think we need to have a same convention. I checked the bundles published by ServiceMix, for those tool components, like commons-*, they do not import their own packages. I also found those bundles published by Felix always import those packages. Generally specaking, it is hard to say which one is better. So, for Geronimo, personally, I prefered the way of ServiceMix, which does not import those packages at the same time for those tool-like components. Any comment ? -- Ivan --0016364ee872b431920479ca9a44 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,
=A0=A0=A0 Currently, Geronimo uses many third-parties bundles (like = pubished by ServiceMix), also publishes some bundles by our own. So, whethe= r importing and exporting the packages at the same time, I think we need to= have a same convention. I checked the bundles published by ServiceMix, for= those tool components, like commons-*, they do not import their own packag= es. I also found those bundles published by Felix always import those packa= ges.=A0 Generally specaking, it is hard to say which one is better. So, for= Geronimo, personally, I prefered the way of ServiceMix, which does not imp= ort those packages at the same time for those tool-like components.
=A0=A0=A0 Any comment ?
--
Ivan
--0016364ee872b431920479ca9a44--