From dev-return-78510-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org Wed Dec 02 17:57:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37249 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 17:57:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2009 17:57:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 82715 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 17:57:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 82614 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 17:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 82605 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2009 17:57:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:57:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.186] (HELO mail-yx0-f186.google.com) (209.85.210.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:57:05 +0000 Received: by yxe16 with SMTP id 16so431827yxe.27 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:56:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=k0rhOR2GgdjJBvPZmJjlmvNIkLvxE6LMZw4XCNlXDTA=; b=sQpIaTTk0gzUVfKmYaeUG198e8pgtAXFOAJ/vEbgV6wMi2qQU6VZcGa9PLcYVjveyo z3UHS3mt7LrcJqXrwjGtwqBEs/aYtBD+jP69090N7vIxI+/O46q9nOJRml2hddCbchgM yESyf7+Phb8iN+HvTJZBz1+5drOPwAJMgfkLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Z688DxqKA8sLVWEzi/oj0rcJod68ES6UwPPGe+KT1VF+CoqT72CGTq29GR7RIcX4LI erH9wAdnVNTgyIyon7KiboNb3lUwC+5NEDjLcmjhRomXBnh+vuuUBwXCkYgSoixwxQ8L DeJkm+WaViwlnxtu7sbEXYym4i6c+0bRbuvsg= Received: by 10.101.133.27 with SMTP id k27mr468967ann.74.1259776604353; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:56:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.194? (cpe-076-182-095-055.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm500576ywg.13.2009.12.02.09.56.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:56:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: Use tomcat trunk in some way? From: Kevan Miller In-Reply-To: <4AADFA1D-0043-40A3-BC09-DBC195F8B081@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:56:40 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <45f744e40912012107v7214b570gd2d2d67881467fce@mail.gmail.com> <33659F73-8316-4EB8-ACDA-3B2F54BA5D92@yahoo.com> <45f744e40912020157p37ec93d0g736c781b8152f49a@mail.gmail.com> <4AADFA1D-0043-40A3-BC09-DBC195F8B081@yahoo.com> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) On Dec 2, 2009, at 11:51 AM, David Jencks wrote: >=20 > On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:57 AM, Ivan wrote: >=20 >> I am thinking whether there is maven plugin would help us to repackge = the tomcat jar file to include our changes, so that we do not need to = maintain the whole Tomcat source codes, maybe just need to keep a few = files. >=20 > AFAIK tomcat is not pushing trunk snapshots into any maven repo, so I = think we'd have to build tomcat ourselves anyway. Given that, I think = that the easiest way is to use the process for constructing a mavenized = build. I'm hoping we won't actually need to modify any files, at least = not for long :-). The first set of changes we needed that led me to set = up the mavenized build have been in tomcat trunk for years. Right. So, if the motivation for this process is to make Tomcat = SNAPSHOT's available in maven, I'm ok with this. I would not want to see = this as a way of fixing functional/integration problems with Tomcat (at = least not in the long-term). --kevan=20=