Jason and I also ran the jaspic tck (which is separate from the javaee tck).  After a little reconfiguration the servlet profile tests all pass.

I'd like to call the vote soon, if you would like to vote please do so soon.

david jencks
On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jason Warner wrote:

+1 from me.  I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully.

~Jason Warner

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not.  I guess they're not, so here's my +1 too.


Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1.
I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/


On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin.

This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>

Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>

If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.

[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks