+1 from me. I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so here's my +1 too.
Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1.
I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin.https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
See the jira issues here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)