geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [PASSED] Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Date Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:48:19 GMT
I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.

I've tried to figure out what needs to go to the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ 
   and set up

http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/

with what I think needs to go there.  Could this get some review  
perhaps from people who have done releases before?

Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff?  I did this:

    123  19:32   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2
    127  19:33   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release* ../2.2/
    128  19:35   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
    129  19:36   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/
    130  19:37   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
    131  19:38   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/
    132  19:38   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
    133  19:39   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/
    134  19:40   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
    135  19:40   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/
    136  19:41   wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
    137  19:42   cp repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ 
releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/ 
*bin.* ../2.2/

thanks
david jencks

On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I've waited long enough.
>
> We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic  
> servlet profile tcks.
>
> +1:  kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,  
> linsun  (all pmc)
>
> no other votes.
>
> I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for  
> the release download page.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built  
>> using the maven-release-plugin.
>>
>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>
>> See the jira issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure  
>> something plausible builds from them.
>>
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Many thanks
>> david jencks
>


Mime
View raw message