geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Date Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:22:43 GMT
I'm still not happy about the README & RELEASE_NOTES missing from the 
assemblies ... so I was kinda hoping some other more critical problem 
was found so that we could include these on a re-spin :-) .  However, I 
don't think it makes sense to stop the vote for just that so here is my 
+1.

Everything else I checked looked good.

Joe



David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the 
> maven-release-plugin.
> 
> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
> 
> See the jira issues here:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965

> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
> 
> Staged to
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
> 
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz

> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip

> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
> 
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
> plausible builds from them.
> 
> 
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> 
> Many thanks
> david jencks


Mime
View raw message