geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Date Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:46:17 GMT
I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems 
raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not.  I guess they're not, 
so here's my +1 too.

Rick

Kevan Miller wrote:
> Here's my +1. 
>
> I reviewed the source and binaries 
> in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/
>
> --kevan
>
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using 
>> the maven-release-plugin.
>>
>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>>
>> See the jira issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965

>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ 
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz

>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip

>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Many thanks
>> david jencks
>


Mime
View raw message