geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:52:57 GMT
I also brought up both Java EE and Minimal images for both web servers 
successfully and did some very minimal operations.  Everything looked 
good.

I also built successfully from the source zip on my mac.

Joe


Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
> Thanks for pulling this together David!
> 
> Here are some things that I've noticed thus far (not necessarily show 
> stoppers) ...
> 
> RAT results:
> These files without Apache headers:
> ./plugins/concurrent/geronimo-concurrent-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/concurrent/harmony/FutureTask.java

> 
> ./plugins/concurrent/geronimo-concurrent-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/concurrent/harmony/RejectedExecutionHandler.java

> 
> ./plugins/concurrent/geronimo-concurrent-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/concurrent/harmony/ThreadPoolExecutor.java

> 
> ./plugins/console/console-base-portlets/src/main/i18n-resources/jms-resource-providers.properties

> 
> 
> 
> README & RELEASE NOTES are not included in the assembly images - just in 
> the source.  I think these should also be in the assemblies and this is 
> what we have done in the past.
> 
> RELEASE NOTES in the source is not updated with the appropriate version 
>  in the name or internal content: RELEASE_NOTES-2.2-SNAPSHOT.txt and 
> @version@ internally (this would not be a problem if we had it included 
> in the binaries with the version # resolved).
> 
> It is not clear to me the purpose of the new assembly - 
> geronimo-plugin-farm-node-2.2.  Is this discussed someplace and will it 
> be made available as an individual download on from our download page?
> 
> Image sizes:
> Our images continue to grow with each new release.  Comparing 2.2 to 
> 2.1.4 I noticed that the minimal assemblies increased in size in the 
> neighborhood of 11% and the Java EE assemblies increased more than 20%. 
>   The Tomcat Java EE image is now around 95MB.  This is just an 
> observation - I wonder at which point the images get so large that we 
> need to consider doing some trimming.
> 
> I'm still looking ... will post if I see anything else.
> 
> Joe
> 


Mime
View raw message