geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] geronimo 2.2 release (2nd try)
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:51:29 GMT
Ashish Jain wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Somehow the links of the staging repository are not accessible. Are 
> you able to access the links?
Try this one:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/

For some reason, this link is going to the -024 version, not the -043 
version in David's email.

Rick


>
> Thanks
> Ashish
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com 
> <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built
>     using the maven-release-plugin.
>
>     This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
>
>     See the jira issues here:
>
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
>
>     Staged to
>
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
>
>     The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
>
>     If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
>     something plausible builds from them.
>
>
>     [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>     [  ]  0 no opinion
>     [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>
>     Many thanks
>     david jencks
>
>


Mime
View raw message