Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81236 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 08:15:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 08:15:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 52145 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 08:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 52100 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 08:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 52091 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 08:15:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xhhsld@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:15:34 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1492910qwb.25 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:15:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=t4LdbaWrG4XaWsoYsFtfa/4tE3f0Nl9clvqST8FCkAY=; b=JFpX3RFOsizBD/tQGJrHI8ja7ER7puQGAVOWlNinTT1fPCoGkB1FSqrBGZzXDOmrc7 HReh3fGoko9UUbVEH3O8qH6yB2dvyz7dTYRwcdZ69bxPWdTafX0FWfa3E2DvD4GW7N13 5kfmsVjQJ0WPhgS7SMul5kUxOArN6LLfRwN/U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dUgbIHuWN1Exss2Jhi5jmAP55O2Edje3hRPZJiioBDz6fUjfsGipZoBM4zDle5jAl4 MR9aGa3Eoj4+ZvgABuXR7oLlqR/gGg7zi8IGbKhMFXEmA12lL1NV+dnw7xzAWyfPkMr8 vAXpcBi3nTRl8s3jfvBrtBvh1QcnrE7J7MHJM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.42.69 with SMTP id r5mr1048432qce.55.1259136913184; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:15:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:15:13 +0800 Message-ID: <45f744e40911250015g1d0a64ady8c5da0e23afcc305@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Is there any license issue about packaging jstl with OSGI information From: Ivan To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368324106f1d1004792da83c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016368324106f1d1004792da83c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Just find that jstl component does not have osgi meta-info shipped, while it is not under ASL 2.0, so is there any license issue for repackaging it with felix-maven.plugin ? Thanks ! -- Ivan --0016368324106f1d1004792da83c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,
=A0=A0=A0 Just find that jstl component does not have osgi meta-info= shipped, while it is not under ASL 2.0, so is there any license issue for = repackaging it with felix-maven.plugin ?
=A0=A0=A0 Thanks = !
--
Ivan
--0016368324106f1d1004792da83c--