geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re-categorize the items in navigation pane for G2.2
Date Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:34 GMT
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:55 PM, viola lu <viola.lu@gmail.com> wrote:

> As Donald Woods noticed, navigation panel re-organization will result in
> console test suite package. From SVT view, this also will affect our
> selenium automation code: first should check all items' path, and update its
> path.This is time-consuming.So it's better to re-organize navigation panel
> in G3.0.Thanks.


I agree there's risk, But I think that some search&replace will make the
selenium work again.

 Anyway, I'm fine to defer this re-org to post-G2.2 release.


>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jack Cai <greensight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 1. JMS Resources and Database Pools stay under Resources group. IIUC,
>>> developers can use @Resource annotation to inject these objects during
>>> runtime. And that's the major reason they shall be in Resources group.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>
>>> 2. Server logs and Derby logs might be placed in another group called
>>> Troubleshooting? or put them together with Monitoring, other viewers and
>>> name as Troubleshooting?
>>>
>>
>> Troubleshooting might not be an adequate label to include monitoring.
>> Maybe we just call it "Monitoring and Troubleshooting", or just split them
>> into two categories.
>>
>>
>>> Donald is making a good point here.  And we do need to consider the risk
>>> of this change. Here are my thoughts for your consideration.
>>>
>>
>> Since most people are focusing on G3.0, maybe we should just let G2.2 go.
>> It'll be good that we push G2.2 out as soon as possible.
>>
>> -Jack
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> viola
>



-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message