geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevan Miller (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4947) Geronimo performance
Date Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:28 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12775983#action_12775983
] 

Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4947:
----------------------------------------

In terms of Geronimo specifics, I don't recall any specifics. 2.0.1 is pretty old. Would definitely
recommend you upgrade, if possible. There have definitely been performance improvements made
since then. 

FYI, here's a performance report created using 2.0.2 -- http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf

> Geronimo performance
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4947
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4947
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>         Environment: Windows 2000 server
>            Reporter: Jean-Jacques Parent
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We have some performance problem with Geronimo.
> Are there known problems when Geronimo is running
> - on a virtual server (VMWare)?
> - on a virtual server with 2 CPU processors ?
> - on a W2000 server ?
> Thanks in advance

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message