geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we create a jee spec bundle for Geronimo?
Date Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:35:39 GMT
David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> Working through the issues of getting openejb to build, I ran into a 
>> classloading constraint violation between the openejb javaee-api 
>> bundle that was getting pulled in as a dependency of openejb-ejbd.  
>> What the openejb project had done was create a bundle that pulled in 
>> all of the different geronimo jee spec implementations into a single 
>> uber jar.   This was fairly simple to add an exclusion to fix the 
>> problem at hand.
>>
>> But this got me to thinking...would it be a good idea for geronimo to 
>> create a similar jar and use that for the spec classes rather than 
>> pulling in all of the spec jars individually?  This might help avoid 
>> some of the conflicts we've been seeing on the spec implementation 
>> classes and simplify a few things.
>
> I'd rather keep them separate and let people assemble servers that 
> don't have all the spec jars if they don't need all of them.  I'm not 
> sure how we'd reduce conflicts by having a single jar.  I think you'd 
> still need to add lots of maven exclusions just like you do now when 
> the wrong jar starts showing up.  Am I missing something?

It just seemed to be easier to deal with situations like the openejb one 
where they were combining all of the specs into a single jar.  It just 
seemed like if they were doing that, then the jar should have been 
coming from us.

>
> thanks
> david jencks
>>
>> Rick
>
>


Mime
View raw message