Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4AC4AD0A.9070608@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:22:18 -0400
From: Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and
 geronimo-valdiation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5
 for OpenJPA
References: <4AC3D344.9060904@apache.org>
 <DC998FC7-A42D-4EC1-9134-87111A20BB49@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DC998FC7-A42D-4EC1-9134-87111A20BB49@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yep, agree on the NOTICE, as I just received a copy of the agreement 
from Geir.  I'll cancel this vote, update the notice files and start 
another vote.  Thanks.


-Donald


Kevan Miller wrote:
> Donald,
> The notice information does not match my understanding of Apache's 
> agreement with Sun. Which I believe should look something like this:
> 
> This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed 
> under the Java Community Process (JCP). The code is untested and 
> presumed not to be a compatible implementation of the 
> <specification-name>. We encourage you to migrate to an implementation 
> of the <specification-name> that has been tested and verified to be 
> compatible as soon as such an implementation is available, and we 
> encourage you to retain this notice in any implementation of 
> <specification-name> that you distribute.
> 
> I'm going to be -1, until we come to a resolution on the above.
> 
> A few wording changes to your email...
> 
> The OpenJPA would *like* to release 2.0.0-M3 release next week. To do 
> this, they need *released* versions of the JPA2 and Bean Validation spec 
> APIs.
> 
> --kevan
> 
>