Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.211.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=KlAtCp7ogug+q8R6dGlyoYwLmhN44947ZNeOpglTpygFHrjvjK4e9dPXzhy/nFp7Vk
         6cYsjFyai4sJ35cMeMCQnpzlKOCX/UsfetALlrR9iKl6tiwDK/l3EwHqjF/C+6LGPMqH
         cU9jnEePhR9airTTK5jLGLgWXNt47kTBuNxRM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Subject: Re: What's the reason why didn't agent-car-jmx get shipped with
  geronimo server by default ?
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f2af330e0909132352x68347b77s546426162acfadaf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:26:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <708B9FB8-E81E-4683-8C40-0503D7800D0F@gmail.com>
References: <f2af330e0909092219m5113f799m5ae7a08d8c77f164@mail.gmail.com>
 <5e7fd1eb0909131856j15e5e6cbw43bbeeee12f140d9@mail.gmail.com>
 <f2af330e0909132352x68347b77s546426162acfadaf@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

> Right,  I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as  
> "load=false".  So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring  
> agent.
>
> When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly  
> easily  without breaking the monitoring.
>
> Does anyone have any other comments ?

Agreed that this would be more convenient for most users. I don't  
recall any specific reason why agent-jmx wasn't included. Vaguely  
recall that ejb support was developed first because MEJB support is  
required per the EE spec.

--kevan